[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] apology... I think...
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] apology... I think...
- From: "Marion S. Thompson" <mst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat Mar 16 03:03:05 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
M/PM... That brings back memories. Applied Management Corp.'s original
parking revenue contol program, Dynapark, ran under that O/S on a Systems
Group S-100 box. The current versions of Dynapark are still running on a
latter day version of M/PM called Real/32. AMC also went through a TurboDOS
phase using IMS multi-S100 CPU boxes - solid! I also learned a little bit
of Unix on an old Altos (Control Data) 8086 system (still have it). That
later came in handy when I switched over to Linux. And now here we all are
on Cobalt RaQ products. A strange journey - I'm feeling pretty old about
now.
mst
Marion S. Thompson
HeleNet Systems
(406) 449-2065
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Jeff Lasman
> Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:51 AM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] apology... I think...
>
>
> Phil Beynon wrote:
>
> > micros to multi user minis covering unix varieties, Microsoft, cpm, mpm,
> > pick, and lots of now long dead O/S.
>
> I also did a lot with M/PM. (Gary Kildahl was a friend for years) and
> with the OSM Zeus, which ran it's own version of multi-user CP/M, one
> Z-80 processor board per user, sharing the hard disk. Kind of like
> Blades today; what goes around comes around, I guess <smile>.
>
> I was also VP of software development for the Lobo, which also had 128k
> and ran either LDOS (making it a TRS-80 Model I work-alike) or CP/M or
> CP/M Plus (Version 3). According to Gary we had the best implmentation
> of CP/M plus there ever was, but it had very little to do with me; it
> was that the 12kk of memory could be broken up so well into pages and
> all of them could be switched in and out of memory. Most S-100 bus
> computers were limited in that the first page could never be swapped
> out; we didn't have that limitation. Good hardware design <smile> which
> I had nothing to do with.
>
> > To be honest the Raq is probably one of the most interesting things I've
> > gotten into for a while now, I've explored PCs to the point
> where they are
> > just boring!
>
> I agree. I just downloaded Kylix. It'll be interesting.
>
> > 128Mb on a TRS80 - you must have upgraded the PSU a bit then!
>
> Brain fart. 128k. And 4mHz as well. It was the OSM Zeus that ran at
> 8mHz, I think.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
> voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>