[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #3972 - 10 msgs
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #3972 - 10 msgs
- From: pa-regionale <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Mar 7 20:40:01 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
hello,
i have a cobalt raq3
when i try to delete a virtual site , i have :
"The system is busy deleting another site. Please wait and try
again."
what must i do
thanks
stephan
curlcc> Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
curlcc> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
curlcc> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
curlcc> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
curlcc> cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> You can reach the person managing the list at
curlcc> cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
curlcc> than "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
curlcc> Today's Topics:
curlcc> 1. Re: OT: Level3 (Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I) (Paul Jacobs)
curlcc> 2. Re: hacks? (Paul Jacobs)
curlcc> 3. Re: anonymous ftp on raq 4I (Paul Jacobs)
curlcc> 4. Help with Remote Email retrieval on QUBE3 (Evan McHugh)
curlcc> 5. Re: OT: Level3 (Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I) (E.B. Dreger)
curlcc> 6. Re: RAQ2 - Still Can't send mail to AOL HELP! (Jeff Lasman)
curlcc> 7. Re: RAQ2 - Still Can't send mail to AOL HELP! (Jeff Lasman)
curlcc> 8. Re: anonymous ftp on raq 4I (E.B. Dreger)
curlcc> 9. Re: RAQ2 - Still Can't send mail to AOL HELP! (Jeff Lasman)
curlcc> 10. Re: [RaQ3]Formmail widely server security (Jeff Lasman)
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 1
curlcc> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:36:47 -0800
curlcc> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> Subject: Re: OT: Level3 (Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I)
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> At 02:22 PM 1/27/2002, you wrote:
>> > Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:42:39 -0800
>> > From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> > OC48, in L.A. and 150.00 per month for 500K of bandwidth and 2
>>
>>OC48 into what? Again, when you near the core, that terminology
>>becomes increasingly inaccurate. I presume that you mean they
>>have OC48 links to other nearby POPs.
>>
>> > U of rack space!!... can't beat that even if there network is
>> > shitty
>>
>>What's nice about them is that they, like C&W and GBLX, support
>>community-based selective as-path padding. They also have nice
>>inbound community tags to flag origin. Kevin Epperson (L3's
>>peering coordinator tech) sent me a list of their supported
>>communites... it's very extensive.
curlcc> Cable and wireless has a very nice network and global crossing, they have a
curlcc> clean network for a company based in Europe, you can not even compare them
curlcc> to level 3 in the same sentence, however...... community based BGP4 as-path
curlcc> padding is very nice and, heavy on overhead.
>>Do you know offhand what their cross-connect policy is?
curlcc> No, I asked once, and got a nasty gram back from there support email address.
>>Eddy
>>
>>Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
>>Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
>>Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
>>--
>>
>>Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
>>From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
>>To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
>>
>>These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
>>send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cobalt-users mailing list
>>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
curlcc> Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
curlcc> Yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> "Host ANY website "
curlcc> http://www.yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 2
curlcc> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:39:51 -0800
curlcc> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] hacks?
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> At 04:55 PM 1/27/2002, you wrote:
>>On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Paul Jacobs wrote:
>>
>> > I am getting many MANY entry's in the log file of my box as seen below:
>> > Jan 27 10:45:00 www inetd[14937]: execv /usr/sbin/in.identd: No such file
>> > or directory
>> >
>> > To me this seems like someone trying to change my identd services file.....
>>
>>been keeping current on updates? What's the time/date stamp on
>>/etc/inetd.conf ?
curlcc> November 28, 11:46
>>g
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cobalt-users mailing list
>>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
curlcc> Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
curlcc> Yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> "Host ANY website "
curlcc> http://www.yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 3
curlcc> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:41:50 -0800
curlcc> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> At 12:17 PM 1/27/2002, you wrote:
>>Limitation of ftp protocol 1 anonymous site / ip address is nothing to do
>>with the stockmarket....
>>
>>don't think 250 aliased ip is working faster on ms platform,
curlcc> Think again... seen XP .net servers in action?
>>for $850 there is no windows box with legal windows server warez
curlcc> Again, you are wrong.
>>cobalt is not proprietary a web based control panel is different than the
>>linux os
curlcc> The cobalt boxes have so many scripts and such a specialized kernel, yes I
curlcc> would say proprietary.
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Paul Jacobs" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:38 AM
>>Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I
>>
>>
>> > SO, I now fully see why SUN Microsystems stock is at 11.16 a share...
>> > You can get no help form anyone on a product they bought (because it was
>> > competing with them directly).
>> >
>> > At 11:45 PM 1/26/2002, you wrote:
>> > >Nobody is stopping you.
>> > >
>> > >At 12:29 AM 1/27/2002, you wrote:
>> > >>If that is true then, using the web interface you can only have 2 I.P.'s
>> > >>per box.....
>> > >>At $2,000.00+ for each box, I would much rather pay $850.00+ for a
>> > >>windows box I can put 200+ I.P.'s on......
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>At 09:41 PM 1/26/2002, you wrote:
>> > >>>On Saturday 26 January 2002 07:14 pm, David Lucas wrote:
>> > >>> > At 01:20 PM 1/26/2002, you wrote:
>> > >>> > >How can I have anonymous ftp access on all my hosted websites?
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > For whatever reason, Go to site manangement for each site, go to FTP
>> > >>> > Settings, and click on the check mark to allow it.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > If you want it for all future virtual sites, go into the default
>>setting
>> > >>> > and select it there.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>> > Good luck and hope you don't have to restore too often.
>> > >>> >
>> > >>>
>> > >>>David, I believe each site that has anonymous ftp also needs to have a
>> > >>>unique
>> > >>>IP address.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>--
>> > >>>Gerald Waugh
>> > >>>Registered Linux User 255245
>> > >>>Register at http://counter.li.org
>> > >>>
>> > >>>_______________________________________________
>> > >>>cobalt-users mailing list
>> > >>>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >>>To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>> > >>>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>> > >>
>> > >>Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
>> > >>Yourwebcentral.com
>> > >>"Host ANY website "
>> > >>http://www.yourwebcentral.com
>> > >>mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>_______________________________________________
>> > >>cobalt-users mailing list
>> > >>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >>To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>> > >>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >_______________________________________________
>> > >cobalt-users mailing list
>> > >cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > >To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>> > >http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>> >
>> > Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
>> > Yourwebcentral.com
>> > "Host ANY website "
>> > http://www.yourwebcentral.com
>> > mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cobalt-users mailing list
>> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>cobalt-users mailing list
>>cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
>>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
curlcc> Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
curlcc> Yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> "Host ANY website "
curlcc> http://www.yourwebcentral.com
curlcc> mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 4
curlcc> From: "Evan McHugh" <Evan.McHugh@xxxxxxx>
curlcc> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 14:44:12 -0500
curlcc> Subject: [cobalt-users] Help with Remote Email retrieval on QUBE3
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> All,
curlcc> I have a QUBE 3 configured in a standard manner with a 56k modem acting as
curlcc> email and internet gateway for a small office.
curlcc> Due to a change in ISPs, the new ISP has a requirement to have xx@xxxxxxxxx
curlcc> as the password, which will meet the character limit, but I can't seem to
curlcc> get around the restriction of not having the @ or the . in the password.
curlcc> Do you know of a manner in which I can edit this by hand in the conf files
curlcc> directly?
curlcc> Thanks in Advance,
curlcc> Evan McHugh
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 5
curlcc> Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:39:21 +0000 (GMT)
curlcc> From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> Subject: Re: OT: Level3 (Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I)
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:36:47 -0800
>> From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cable and wireless has a very nice network and global crossing,
>> they have a clean network for a company based in Europe, you
curlcc> C&W is British.
curlcc> GBLX was based out of USA, then a Carribean island (IIRC)... now
curlcc> it's headed to Asian controlling interest.
>> can not even compare them to level 3 in the same sentence,
curlcc> L3 has the best BGP community support that I've seen from a large
curlcc> network. I'd not use them alone, but I can't say that there's
curlcc> any one provider I would. Find the good routes, use them, and
curlcc> pad the bejabbers out of the others.
>> however...... community based BGP4 as-path padding is very nice
>> and, heavy on overhead.
curlcc> Communities aren't high-overhead. Jeez, if you have to update
curlcc> your RIB often enough for _that_ to make a difference, you'll
curlcc> have long since been dampened into oblivion.
>> >Do you know offhand what their cross-connect policy is?
>>
>> No, I asked once, and got a nasty gram back from there support
>> email address.
curlcc> Hmmmm. Sounds odd. Try hanging out on NANOG a bit longer. ;-)
curlcc> Eddy
curlcc> Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
curlcc> Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
curlcc> Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
curlcc> --
curlcc> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
curlcc> From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
curlcc> Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
curlcc> These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
curlcc> send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.
curlcc> --__--__--
curlcc> Message: 6
curlcc> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:59:36 -0800
curlcc> From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
curlcc> Organization: nobaloney.net
curlcc> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ2 - Still Can't send mail to AOL HELP!
curlcc> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
curlcc> "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
>> I don't see how anything I said "makes it look like your
>> wrong"... there would have to be some sort of contradiction where
>> I provide more/better evidence. But I see no conflict.
>>
>> > It doesn't look like you're disagreeing with anything I've written, so
>> > I'm wondering.
>>
>> No disagreement... your message seemed to be the most logical one
>> to give more details. Too much caffeine? Not enough? Are your
>> posts sacred? I think that this is the first time someone ever
>> questioned (challenged?) why I chose their post to respond...
curlcc> Nah, just very upset over a customer. Sorry to take it out on you. I
curlcc> apologize.
>> Feh. I must have snipped out a transitional paragraph or two of
>> mine, been half asleep, lost my train of thought while debugging,
>> yada yada yada...
curlcc> We all do that. As I said, I was overly upset and overly sensitive.
curlcc> Did $1450 worth of business for a customer. Missed meals and sleep.
curlcc> Then he decided he'd only pay if he could settle for much less. Such is
curlcc> life.
>> Quick summary/replacement in case anyone is still following the
>> thread:
>>
>> Forward DNS is delegated via an authority chain. When
>> one registers a domain... root --> gTLD --> authority.
>> Reverse works the same way.
curlcc> Though I've deleted the rest, I'm glad to see it <smile>.
>> 'Whois' is not the mechanism by which authoritative DNS
>> servers are named, contrary to popular belief. It's
>> delegation, which is handled entirely via the DNS system.
curlcc> Whois is a completely separate hierarchy of databases. But I guess
curlcc> you're right; a lot of people didn't know that.
>> Thanks for pointing this one out to me. I think you're wound a
>> bit too tight on the other issues, but your points there were
>> well taken.
curlcc> As I've said... just how I was feeling at the time; just me. Just me.
curlcc> Just me.
curlcc> (How many lashes do I have to give myself, the wet noodle is falling
curlcc> apart <smlie>.)
>> Your point about having posted something before? Rare is it that
>> I post something once and never again. I'd wager that half a
>> dozen of us on here have posted the same responses a few score
>> times -- on DNS issues alone.
curlcc> Absolutely. I was just upset and tired. And upset. And tired. <wry
grin>>
>> > > Watch out for upstreams that claim it's a major, expensive
>> > > operation to do. It isn't. If your provider claims that it'll
>> > > take a week and a few hundred dollars, it's time to go shopping.
>> > > Tell them to read RFC 2317.
>> >
>> > First of all, if your upstream doesn't have authority they can't
>> > delegate it. Second, if they do have authority, they're responsible for
>>
>> Obviously. (I hope, anyway.)
curlcc> I was just pointing out that there are reasons why upstreams don't
curlcc> delegate reverse DNS. That's all <smile>.
>> I can tell a few stories about people who forced NS authority to
>> themselves, but had it set up improperly. Suddenly, hosed DNS
>> (in these specific cases) means that they can't accept mail on
>> their POC handles to transfer it back. And they wondered why
>> things broke...
curlcc> <smile>. Yep we see that all the time. Most people who come to us for
curlcc> DNS services have really messed it up big time. I like the fact that I
curlcc> have contacts almost everywhere (yes, even at NSI) to fix those things.
curlcc> And I understand why NSI is switching to the same web-based interface
curlcc> everyone else uses, now that it's been accepted and proved itself.
>> Yup. The "plug it in and turn it on" claims are not true. Why
>> not build a CGI tool that generates reverse DNS from forward
>> info, and digs to see who is authoritative. It would save many
>> newcomers hours of headaches.
curlcc> And me as well. My client (see above) blames me because his machine is
curlcc> hackable. Says it's because I didn't secure it well enough. The RaQ is
curlcc> a lot harder to secure than any generic system, simply because you can't
curlcc> upgrade things, even for security, without risking breaking something in
curlcc> the gui <frown>.
curlcc> Jeff
stéphan waraux