[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] ssh stopped working and can't login as root
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] ssh stopped working and can't login as root
- From: "Wayne Sagar" <shortfork@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri Mar 1 18:10:02 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
WinSCP2 differentiates based on suffix rules, or lets you decide on a
case by case basis.
As usual Jeff, great reply! So if I understand correctly, WinSCP2 will let
me choose between asskey and binary, similar to the way WSFTP will... Very
cool!
We let customers manage their own sites via ftp. We lock them to their
own directory path. We separate email accounts from ftp accounts.
Very few websites have ever been defaced using ftp. Most are defaced by
other exploits, usually aimed at "root" or "real" sites, not at virtual
sites such as those the RaQ uses.
I *think* this is also what I'm doing with sites. I only have a couple that
I am not the manager of and the only person who uploads anything to them. I
try to lock email accounts to a separate, non privlidged user.. Quick
question relating to this. I keep FTP server off, unless I'm using it or if
someone else needs it. Which conveniently at this point is rare and I'm
quite familiar with the users who need it.. But it is a problem at times.
How much am I gaining in security by keeping it off. I see a number of
anonymous FTP attempts when it is on in my logs and, as always, lots of
probes to port 21 at all times. Since getting hacked (by the bind deal about
a year ago) I've been probably a bit "paranoid" about security.. some would
say to obsession, am I ganing anything by keeping FTP server off most of the
time?
Related question.. How much risk is involved in giving shell access to a
virtual site if I'm the only one that has access to that site.. ie I'm the
administrator of the virt? This would be so I could use Winscp2 instead of
FTP to administer that site? I could upload to the site as server admin with
Winscp2 and then chown the files but sometimes there are 200 files that go
up at one time and that would be an added hassle.
FP uploads via http, as does Netscape's browser. FP can't require
sendmail, since it's designed to run on WinNT/2K, and most people don't
run sendmail on WinNT/2k.
Ahh.. I guess this is good, and bad all at the same time then. And I guess,
since I need to offer it (FP) I'd rather not even know how it works and what
holes it opens, it'll just give me something else to fret about!
As always, thanks for all the good info Jeff!
Wayne
_________________________________________________________________
Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com