Re: [cobalt-users] Kernel Update for RAQ4r

[cobalt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hey Curtis and Cobalters,
Man... I never saw that the RaQ4-All-Kernel-1.0.1-2.216C27III.pkg
wat NOT to be installed on 4r's. Where did it say that and WHY
did Cobalt not put a big disclaimer next to the package. I loaded
the kernel patch and now my eth0 is unusable (i.e- the machine is 
rendered useless)

Has anyone found a way to "back out" of the patch or a work around.
What's the deal with this, and is the OS upgrade 2.0 able to be done
with out this kernel patch?

Thanks for any info!

Cobalt Man








On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 01:42:03PM -0600, Curtis Ross wrote:
> Hello All,
> I know this has been asked before but I never did see an official answer
> or one that was acceptable.
> 
> The RaQ4-All-Kernel-1.0.1-2.216C27III.pkg was NOT to be installed on Sun
> Cobalt RaQ4r server appliances. This was communicated after a bunch of
> us had installed the update.
> 
> Now what? What are the implications? Is there a new pkg in the works (I
> believe someone had mentioned there was)?
> 
> I noticed there is a RaQ4-All-Kernel-1.0.1-2.216C28III-2.pkg from the
> downloads. Is this production?
> 
> If someone can provide some insight to this that has spoke with Cobalt
> (or heard a good rumor) please let us know. I have a bunch of 4r's to
> rebuild and I don't want to do it twice!
> 
> Thanks,
> Curtis Ross
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users