[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ 3: IP's used -> the same one over and over for access from web?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ 3: IP's used -> the same one over and over for access from web?
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Feb 3 19:08:05 2002
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Marcel's Work Mail wrote:
> So, I configure www.food.com to be the primary site. It uses the
> 192.168.45.95 IP of the RAQ. That works wonderful. But then the confusion
> clouds me:
>
> -in order for the second site to be viewable from the internet, I have to
> give it the same IP as well (192.168.45.95)?
It works <smile>. There are other ways to do it, depending on how many
public IP#s your ISP has provided you, and just how your natting
firewall works.
> Then the RAQ chucks up some
> bandwidth warning that I'm not fast enough to read but it all works,
> including mail. Was this the correct thing to do? I tried using .96 for the
> last octet on the "virtual site" www.drink.com, but then it just simply
> redirects to the site on .95 (www.food.com)
I don't have any idea how you'd set up the NATting, which is probably at
issue. Yes, this will work, except for issues like SSL.
> So, in closing, lets say I had 8 distinct domains, they'd all use the same
> IP on the RAQ?
Yes.
> (Plus, if anyone has eyes that can read fast enough: what
> does that bandwidth error say when the same IP is saved for a virtual
> site?).
It warns you that you've changed a domain that shares an IP, and that
that could affect any bandwidth limitations you've got set up. Not to
worry <smile>.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 778-9980 * fax: (702) 548-9484