[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] anonymous ftp on raq 4I
- From: Paul Jacobs <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Jan 28 18:21:50 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
At 11:54 AM 1/27/2002, you wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Paul Jacobs wrote:
> I am not very linux or unix savoy, but I have worked with some....
But you nonetheless feel compelled to argue technical merit ;P
> The fact that you have to install a virtual NIC for every I.P. that does
> not have a physical NIC slows the OS down, I have found past 50 I.P.'s on
> any linux box slows it down badly.
And you don't think windows has virtual network interface abstractions?
Yea, but windows does not crap out after 50 I.P.'s... I have a box running
200 I.P.'s on a 3C908-TX from 3com just fine.
>
> Not wanting to start a holy war here just sharing my problems....
Ahh...the 'i am not a toll' disclaimer
>
> As for the cobalt boxes.... everything is passed through a database loaded
> on the box, and everything is referenced from it for all hosting
functions,
> so adding anything to the box for hosting needs to pass through the
> database??!.
And? Yoy don't like databases? Hmm, You must have tried to out ms access,
i don't blame you , i would probably hate databases if i was forced to use
it also ;P
The database on the RAQ4 is more like SQL, if it were more like access ( a
jet database format) I could figure it out :)
> the cobalt boxes are so proprietary as far as the OS config goes you
should
> call them a Packard bell (a hardware reference of a system that died out
> because it was so hard to program drivers for there hardware)
Some of us rather likes the little white Packard Bell's , and had no real
problems uaing them, granted their modes is a sound card card was a
disaster, but it was targeted at the low end , so who cares?
As to linux being proprietary, FUD ;)
The cobalt boxes have so many scripts and such a specialized kernel, yes I
would say proprietary.
linux+postgress+apache is about as standard run of the mill as i have seen
anywhere, cobalt's interface is cobalt's, so what? plesk's is theirs,
windows IIS admin panel is open software? LOL
So I have to learn postgress?, the apache post to windows was and is a
disaster.
[trash deleted]
gsh
_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
Paul Jacobs /Senior Network Eng.
Yourwebcentral.com
"Host ANY website "
http://www.yourwebcentral.com
mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx