[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Re Anonymous FTP
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Re Anonymous FTP
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Jan 27 18:23:02 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 13:33:21 -0600
> From: David Lucas <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Further to this thread, if you need to have HTTPS for individual sites, then
> >you also need individual IPs for those sites. The certification will only
> >resolve 1 domain per ip so the certificate would show up with an error (name
> >on certificate does not match the name of the site) if you only have 1 ip
> >for the server.
>
> Actually incorrect. You can use one ip and different ports.
One can use port perversion for virtually anything. But it's not
really a good idea. Think packet filters at corporate networks.
Again, will elaborate if needed. But standards exist for a
reason. Really.
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.