[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3] DNS primary and secondary on two RaQ3's
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3] DNS primary and secondary on two RaQ3's
- From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Jan 24 16:22:00 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:39:11 -0500
> From: Robert Fitzpatrick <robert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> I thought about doing this, but was worried that the Cobalt PostgreSQL
> database has DNS information that would not be in line with the
> changes on the server where the information is headed. Would this be
> true? If so, is there a way to update the database after the rsync is
> done?
Hmmmm. I'd have to stop and check what's in the pgsql database.
One can always pg_dump a database, rsync it to a slave, drop the
old copy on the slave, and pg_restore from the rsync'ed file...
but that's starting to push things.
I suppose it depends how concerned you are about GUI operation.
In my case, not very. BIND will run happily based on its config
files.
Eddy
Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>
To: blacklist@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.
These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT
send mail to <blacklist@xxxxxxxxx>, or you are likely to be blocked.