[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] NEWBIE: how to edit a system file (httpd.conf and srm.conf) on a RAQ3 system?
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] NEWBIE: how to edit a system file (httpd.conf and srm.conf) on a RAQ3 system?
- From: "MikeM" <MyRaQ@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue Jan 15 13:55:13 2002
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On 1/15/02 at 8:23 AM Chris Demain wrote:
|[snip]
|While some may argue that one is better, or one is more powerful, etc, be a
|little more forward thinking.
|pico is a good editor, but has some drawbacks: 1) not open source 2) only
|there because of pine, 3) not a standard UNIX editor. Of all the editors
|available, the only one guaranteed to be on any UNIX or UNIX-like machine
|is vi. Hard as it may seem to learn, it's the one that's ubiquitous.
|
|</uw_software_rant>
=============
I bounce around a few different systems, and I tend to agree with your comment about vi. I maintain a basic set of skills in the usage of vi because it *is* everywhere. That allows me to be able to edit a file no matter what version of unix I happen to be sitting in front of at the moment.
On the other hand, if I spend a lot of time on a particular system, I tend to download and install nano as my editor of preference (and I disable line-wrapping as the default in nano). So long as I maintain a basic skill set in vi, I see no need to continue to flog myself in vi when there are alternatives available that are more suitable to my preferences.