Re: [cobalt-users] Stupid question: SETI@home for RAQ?

[SteelHead <bill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

uhhh, Seti @home has no relation to the @home network
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/
Regards,
Bill Ries-Knight
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
2 cases of canned spam every day.
That's all we ask from each sysadmin.
(Oh, and don't forget the site the spam is for!)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Will Eberle" <wiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 7:39 PM
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Stupid question: SETI@home for
RAQ?


| Apparently you live in an area of the country which does
not get news
| reports. @home is a now-defunct (or at least spotty 'till
it goes black
| forever in slightly less than 90 days) entity. Anyone
using AT&T's former
| @home service has been unceremoniously dumped in the lap
of @attbi.com.
| Comcast Cable and one or more other calme companies
shelled out 150+ million
| and upped fees to exite@home to maintain service for the
aforementioned 90
| days, ostensibly while they ready their own networks. You
PROBABLY want to
| keep as much distance as you can between your business and
@home.
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
flash22@xxxxxxx
| Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 1:42 AM
| To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Stupid question: SETI@home for
RAQ?
|
| On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Harry Mueller wrote:
|
| > Greetings All,
| >
| >       The client I sold a RAQ4r to last month calls me
up today asking
| > if there is a SETI@Home client that he can run on his
RAQ. Why? Beats
| > me but I said I would look into it and get back to him
Monday.
| >
| >       Has anyone fielded this question before? I didn't
see
| > anything on the setiathome website but I could have
missed it.
|
| There is a linux X86 client, it has no pretty graphics tho
:P
|
| It's staticlly linked, so it should run on most X86 linux
machines
| including a raqX , Havn't actually tried it tho. It does
use some ram, and
| will probably increase server latency, For what a Raq
costs it seems like
| a silly use... There is no pretty RPM, just a tgz file,
dump it in a
| directory, minor setup, make a startup script...
|
| Oh, yeah, it transfers ~ 3/4meg a day, so you get to sell
a little
| bandwidth :P
|
| This client should work on any x86 type Raq (eg > Raq2):
|
ftp://serendip.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-
linux-gnulibc1-s
| tatic.tar
|
| This client needs glibc2.1, will save memory, but it' more
likely to not
| work (I'm almost certain it won't on a Raq3, Not really
sure what c lib
| version the 4 has)
|
|
ftp://serendip.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-
linux-gnu-gnulib
| c2.1.tar
|
| Download index page, and alternate mirror sites:
|
| http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/unix.html
|
| gsh
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| cobalt-users mailing list
| cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
| http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
|
| _______________________________________________
| cobalt-users mailing list
| cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
| http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
|