[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Stupid question: SETI@home for RAQ?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Stupid question: SETI@home for RAQ?
- From: flash22@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri Dec 14 22:32:00 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Harry Mueller wrote:
> Greetings All,
>
> The client I sold a RAQ4r to last month calls me up today asking
> if there is a SETI@Home client that he can run on his RAQ. Why? Beats
> me but I said I would look into it and get back to him Monday.
>
> Has anyone fielded this question before? I didn't see
> anything on the setiathome website but I could have missed it.
There is a linux X86 client, it has no pretty graphics tho :P
It's staticlly linked, so it should run on most X86 linux machines
including a raqX , Havn't actually tried it tho. It does use some ram, and
will probably increase server latency, For what a Raq costs it seems like
a silly use... There is no pretty RPM, just a tgz file, dump it in a
directory, minor setup, make a startup script...
Oh, yeah, it transfers ~ 3/4meg a day, so you get to sell a little
bandwidth :P
This client should work on any x86 type Raq (eg > Raq2):
ftp://serendip.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-linux-gnulibc1-static.tar
This client needs glibc2.1, will save memory, but it' more likely to not
work (I'm almost certain it won't on a Raq3, Not really sure what c lib
version the 4 has)
ftp://serendip.ssl.berkeley.edu/pub/setiathome-3.03.i386-pc-linux-gnu-gnulibc2.1.tar
Download index page, and alternate mirror sites:
http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/unix.html
gsh