[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Maximum Sites Allowed for RaQ 3 or 4
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Maximum Sites Allowed for RaQ 3 or 4
- From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Sep 16 15:45:34 2001
- Organization: nobaloney.net
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
Arsalan Mahmud wrote:
> Sure go for plesk, but the security will be an issue with plesk, this
> is where the RAQ's are better,
And you're just going to leave us there? Friends of mine, hosting
thousands of sites on tens of systems, have had no security issues with
Plesk and praise it highly. What's your problem? What have you heard
or read? Where?
> As far as i know a Raq3 can host upto 250 sites..
Which is exactly what I wrote. Your point? I mean your point other
than to disparage Plesk without explaining why?
Personally, I'd like to see Plesk running on a RaQ; should it turn out
to work well, we may offer it as a product. If you've got real
experience or information with Plesk (2.0) as a security hole, I'd like
to know it.
Jeff
--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Linux and Cobalt/Sun/RaQ Consulting
nobaloney.net
P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517
voice: (909) 787-8589 * fax: (909) 782-0205