Re: [cobalt-users] Cobalts foTHe December one was sent due to sor sale

[Michael <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 02:31 PM 08/17/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Boy, you must have a poor pathetic life and no time to do anything but put
>people down. I feel sorry for you.  I will not post again, unless hell
>frizzes over.
>
>David
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <webhosting@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 1:34 PM
>Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Cobalts for sale
>
>
>> > The person who did this complaint to
>> > my provider
>> > in my books, is the lowest scum of the earth for one innocent
>> > posting.
>>
>> One?
>> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2001-January/029809.html
>> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-December/027409.html
>> Just found these by searching quickly with your address in the archives.
>>

I kinda thought Dan was being gentle with you.  You know lots of people have Raqs for sale out there, but you don't see many of them try to use the list, simply because they know it will cause complaints.  Also noticed that you top-post, even another rule that you break.

He is not the only one to complain I assure you.  I have about 20 thousand messages in a special mailbox that I search through for cobalt answers, imagine how big that were to get if everyone tolerated for-sale messages?

It's not that your message is a "bad" deal, or anything like that, it's just that if you did it with no flack, then before you know it 50% or more of the messages here would be spam.

Michael Thiessen