[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Worst day yet for Code Red (at least here)
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Worst day yet for Code Red (at least here)
- From: Michael <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Aug 5 08:30:04 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
At 11:19 PM 08/05/01 +0200, you wrote:
>Why would you want that? Its doing no harm what so ever to your RaQ.
>I'm sure that if your co-lo could, they would filter it at their core.
>
>At 15:55 5-8-2001 -0400, you wrote:
>>I know we're immune but I've been watching the number of Code Red incursions
>>against my Raq. Where previously I'd been hit anywhere between 150-250
>>times a day, today at 3:50PM I've been probed 516 times. Is it possible
>>that these probes could be stopped at the co-lo's router? Would it make a
>>difference?
I feel for ya bro, I was gettting 500+ sircams to my raq4 before I put in procmail filters. I still get the bandwidth consumed, the data stream is still intact, they just go to /dev/null instead of my in box. According to my procmail log I am STILL being relentlessly hammered, it just don't "seem" as bad when you don't have to dload the messages.
Mike