RE: [cobalt-users] Qube 3 versus raq4

["Brett Barron" <bb2@xxxxxxxx>]

Go for the Qube3, it's better for your situation.  From the stand point of
performance, the Qube3 and Qube4 are essentially identical.  From the stand
point of features, the Qube3 is designed for a LAN so it may better suite
your needs.  Read the feature specs of both to make your decision.

--bb

-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Kevin D
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 7:57 AM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cobalt-users] Qube 3 versus raq4


I'm looking to add a server to my local lan. Its primary purpose will be to
handle a web site, email, and ftp from behind a firewall. Is the Qube3 just
as good as the raq4 for this job? I want to make sure that the Qube can
handle these functions through the web interface.

There will only be 1 web site and maybe 50 or so email addresses. The reason
I am interested in the Qube is that it is in stock, cheaper, and since this
is going to be on a lan, there is no rackmount / space constraints.

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users