[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] Using vacation message for automated response
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Using vacation message for automated response
- From: "GPS" <gps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun Jul 8 02:26:49 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
>> Or, better yet, use Procmail unless you only have the one site. The vacation
>> message accessed by users through www.domain.com/personal/ was designed so
>> that a mailing list like this doesn't get bombarded by auto-replies which
>> may happen to your users if you change the time on that. There are some
>> procmail recipes and instructions in the archives for setting up a true
>> auto-responder on the RaQ.
>> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-July/017038.html
>
>>From time to time folks have had problems with the method cited above.
>
>send email to procraq@xxxxxxxxxxxx and you'll get an instruction file
>and example(s) via return email.
>
>Thom
>baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thom LaCosta K3HRN Webmaster
And at the end of Thom's informative procraq autoresponder he seems to
give the orginal author something of a credit here:
"Original minimal information was posted at
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-developers/2000-March/000394.html"
Actually the orginal non-minimal version is from my orginal post:
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-July/017038.html
I've posted different versions of the same info since Raq1 since
autoresponders vs vacation replies were my own pet peeve about the
Raq systems.
Tony