Re: [cobalt-users] Archive threading [conclusion]

[shimi <shimi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Dan Kriwitsky wrote:

> > Uhm, if the subject and the body (what you read now) are erased, isn't
> > that defined "a new message"?
> >
> 
> Look at the headers. Erasing the subject and body doesn't change:
> In-Reply-To: <NDBBLPLFKLPKMLKNPCKDKEEOFJAA.webhosting@xxxxxxxxx>
> Which is what is used for the archive threading. Even if I changed the
> subject of this post, it would still follow
> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2001-June/046852.html in the
> archive when you look at
> http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2001-June/
> --
> Dan Kriwitsky
> 

I figured the body headers will be your answer... i'm with unix for 3
years now and couldn't find where to tell PINE to show them... maybe you
know? :-)

So people, in conclusion.. JUST TYPE IT!!!! It's only ~20 chars, your
mails are longer! :)

- shimi.