[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cobalt-users] Secondary Mail server problem on a RAQ4



some how the original question got lost......

the question was why is it that when email is send from the second server that has the lower priority on MX record it goes to the same server and not the one that has more priority in this case ... (mail.nieto.net)

TIA
Carlos

At 10:46 AM 6/29/2001 -0500, you wrote:
At 6/29/01 12:55 AM -0700, you wrote:
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> nieto.net.              1D IN MX        30 mail.nieto.net.
> nieto.net.              1D IN MX        40 pop.nieto.net.
>
> These appear to me to both be low priority mx entries. Shouldn't they be 10
> and 20 generally speaking?
>
> Cheers,
> Brad

Shimi's right; the actual numbers do not matter at all. You could use 100 and 687 for all it cares.

The only thing that matters is that the lowest number is used first. MX entries with equal priority numbers get requests divided evenly among them (3 entries, 1/3 of traffic each). I use 10,20,30 just to make my life easy, but no one and nothing cares which numbers you select. Just be consistent.


--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users