[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] raq4i vs raq4r
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] raq4i vs raq4r
- From: "Curtis Ross" <Curtis_Ross@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue May 29 04:21:10 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@CPR
> Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 8:10 AM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] raq4i vs raq4r
>
>
> thanks for your reply.
> so, basically, the 2nd hard drive is for sort of back up purpose
only(better
> than just back up i mean).
> Am I right? That means I cannot use 2 hard drives for virtual sites.
(in
> case i give up on mirroring function.)
> at the time I was getting this 4r, I thought I could use all 40 GB for
my
> users.( I have 500 users now and growing).
> Is it possible to use all 40 GB and give up on raid?
>
>
> TIA,
> mchung.
>
I think you could dump the 4r O/S and restore it with the 4i disk. Then
add the second HDD as extra storage. I've never tried it : )
Curtis