RE: [cobalt-users] Upset about all the Cobalt limitations?

["Digital Rage" <techmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My experience with UVNetworks was ok.  The appliance
performed comparable to the RaQ.  I did have problems
getting such things as Samba working though.  UVN
told me that I couldn't use the web appliance and add
external apps to it, I had to get the non-closed unit
if I wanted to those things.

(puzzled ??)

After a few weeks they called back and said that I could
infect add software and services to the box, but warned me
about violating the warranty.

Dan

........................................
Digital Rage Internet Services
Internet Web & E-Commerce Hosting
Nation Wide Dialup Internet Access
http://www.digitalrage.net
1.888.355.0072



-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sheila Harrell
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:01 PM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cobalt-users] Upset about all the Cobalt limitations?


Hey Guys,

I am sending this out because I am tired of running into all the limitations
of this Cobalt server.  I have finally pleaded insanity and searched for
other solutions.  What I have found is that no system is perfect(I already
knew that).  Also, I have found that you get one thing but not another. Then
low and behold it hit me.  A perfect solution would be more bit, ASP support
and something that didn't cost me my co.  What I found was that I can get
more bit per buck and I am being offered the SUN Solaris platform.  I am not
totally familiar but the research I have conducted has proved to me I have
nothing to lose.

I am seeking some kind of performance evaluation between the UVNetworks
Webbox and the Cobalt.  Is anyone familiar with this and why is one box
better than the others?

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users