[cobalt-users] RE: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #2814 - 16 msgs

["John" <js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Message: 4
From: Dom Latter <DLatter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] IMPORTANT SECURITY MESSAGE TO COBALT
Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 17:36:57 +0200
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jay Kraft [mailto:jkraft@xxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote one word:

> flame!

<snip many lines of quote, including a copy of the list-sig>

<snip many more lines of dull self justification>

bandwidth is cheap enough for the one word "flame!" to have far more import
than the newbie over posting that went with it.

The main point is that transgression of imagined boundaries are always
better dealt with off list - and that includes everyone (yes and me),
somebody transgresses - mail 'em off list or the so called crime you commit
is just as bad as commited by those you flame.

If you are making a general point, make it to all, if not make it to the
individual.