Re: [cobalt-users] virtusertable - Non Gui Add

[baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

On Sun, 13 May 2001, Steve Werby wrote:

> 
> OK, I should have known better.  I assumed the person using the script would
> be aware that the arguments are required (and non-empty) and that the only
> case that needed to be checked for was when less than the expected # of
> arguments were supplied.

Gee, I'm the person who asked, and I understood the script.

  If I was writing a bash script for my own usage I
> would do it my way, but if I was writing to check for bad arguments I would
> check each argument using a loop and I would do things like verify that the
> domain exists on the box.

Yep...there are a lot of things that could be added....but from a
requestor's point of view:

The response was very timely
The script did what I requested

What's even more interesting is that there was exactly one response
to the request...and numerous comments, improvements, and i would haves.

Thom

baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             Thom LaCosta K3HRN Webmaster