RE: [cobalt-users] (no subject)

["Dan Kriwitsky" <webhosting@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> Correct Dan, and someone brought up that there are some
> "Dedicated servers"
> that aren't really dedicated but seem so with software.  Therefore I was
> replying in context.
>

Yes, but I was trying to keep it on track about Cobalt and Rackshack since
the one reply that started to get this off-track seemed to be one of those,
"yeah, we sell that service too." when the service they sell is not what was
being compared. They were making some assumption that in order to sell what
RackShack was selling it couldn't be a real dedicated Cobalt and must be a
shared server.

My guess about RackShack is that, if they are owned by the Really HugeTM
dialup ISP, they have lots of bandwidth, the cost of which is covered by
their dialup users and will probably never really all get used, so they can
offer large amounts of bandwidth to the RaQ users and not worry. That, and
they may have you limited so you'll never really be able to use that much in
one month at the rate Rodolfo calculated per second.
--
Dan Kriwitsky