Re: [cobalt-users] Re: fpx.httpd.conf

["Colin J. Raven" <cjraven@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Robert Hughes wrote:

> In Dan's last post he mentions:
> 
> > Thanks. It's amazing what can be found in the archive especially things like
> > "fpx.httpd.conf" and "lame server" from recent posts.
> 
> Well, I'm the one who posted the question about fpx.httpd.conf 
> after I had done a search in the archives, and found 11
> returns, none of which explained what the hell the file was. 
> The user manual also does not mention it as far as I can tell.

<boredom snippage>

PLEASE set your word wrap. Protocol #1
DON'T *abuse* people, flame 'em perhaps but you went way too damn far.
A night's sleep often helps before composition even begins! (personal
experience)

Now to the issue:
Well, Dan was correct. A search of the archives tunred up some significant
results:
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-April/009499.html
Which is written *by* someone at Cobalt and although doesn't spell out
what an fpx file is, nonetheless gives enough info to possible deduce what
the file had to do with.

More mentions of fpx.httpd.conf 
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-December/029003.html
http://list.cobalt.com/pipermail/cobalt-users/2000-February/004920.html

So in conclusion...."RTFM" and hold all of the spurious electrons.
You haven't contributed anything of value, so you haven't earned the right
to start blwoing snot and abuse all over the list.

Don't like the advice???? Unsubscribe.	

Regards,
-Colin
--
Colin J. Raven
Linux Registered User #82296
Sun Apr  8 14:35:00 EDT 2001
  2:35pm  up 39 days, 18:06,  1 user,  load average: 0.04, 0.08, 0.02