[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] Re: aspiring moderators
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Re: aspiring moderators
- From: Mark Roebuck <mroebuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat Apr 7 01:38:08 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
At 3/28/01 12:24 AM +0100, you wrote:
>It appears some on this list are spending too much time in hopeful
>anticipation of work..
Sigh... I'm just going to let this one go.
It's bad enough when we all try to moderate the list. But when someone
tries to moderate the efforts of those trying to moderate, yet doesn't even
realize he's trying to moderate, well... <grin>
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
I do not think that it is a problem with people trying to moderate the list,
the main problem is the attitude that comes across in some of the replies.
In the guidelines it talks about communicating with people as if you were
face to face with them. I am curoius to know whether some of the reply's
that I have seen would have been sent if they were face to face with Mike
Tyson.
If someone wants to point out that a post is against the rules then fine,
but be nice. I also think that useless posts such as "another one for the
kill file" and such like should not be posted, what good are they for the
list?
Thanks
Mark Roebuck