[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re : RaQ3 email alias problem (David Lynch)
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re : RaQ3 email alias problem (David Lynch)
- From: "Cobalt" <wylim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Mar 8 23:06:09 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
For the admin alias problem, you'll need to edit the virtusertable file in
/etc directory using root.
Inside this file you'll see some entries like this
admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx admin
Search for the domain entry e.g. admin@xxxxxxxxx and delete it away.
(NOTE : do not delete your server domain admin entry.)
Save the file and exit telnet.
Go back to Web interface and save the domain admin aliase again. It should
work.
Don't worry "Cobalt OS Release 5.0" comes with the Cobalt installation
itself.
Regards
> From: "David Lynch" <sKiTz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Cobalt-Users@List. Cobalt. Com" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 00:25:03 -0500
> Subject: [cobalt-users] RaQ3 email alias problem
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hello from a new list member,
>
> I just spent the last half hour searching the archives for the answer to
> this question... please forgive me if it's been answered, but I can only
> find one thread that even comes close, and it doesn't answer my ???
>
> I ran my RaQ3 effortlessly and without hitch, until that RaQ3-en-Update-OS
> Release 4.0 ... I see a lot of strange things happening to several people
> since that.
>
> My problem is this: No one can use the "admin" alias since that update.
> Before, it was no problem... any domain could have an "admin" email alias
> (not a username, of course) ... now, it won't accept the alias on new
> domains, and old domains set up with the alias, send the email to me (USER
> admin.)
>
> Also, Webalizer crapped out after that update.
>
> A final thing... just noticed today, as I installed the most recent
security
> updates from cobalt, that Cobalt OS Release 5.0 is showing as an installed
> pkg.... I sure didn't install it... and I don't think it was there
before...
> Am I losing my mind?
>
> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> David Lynch