[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Hacked Raq3 - some symptoms
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Hacked Raq3 - some symptoms
- From: flash22@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sat Feb 24 15:19:03 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, vijay wrote:
> Following is the one which Hacked my system.
>
> Feb 18 16:23:20 xxxxxx named[6270]: starting (/etc/named.conf). named
> 8.2.3-RE
> L Fri Feb 9 19:22:23 EST 2001 ^Iroot@choke:/tmp/update/src/bin/named
> <mailto:^Iroot@choke:/tmp/update/src/bin/named>
Cute, he updated bind for you -/ Hint that that is probably how he got in
also....
> Feb 20 13:36:36 xxxxx useradd[10783]: new group: name=named, gid=25
> Feb 20 13:36:36 xxxxx useradd[10783]: new user: name=named, uid=25,
> This is how the hacker created a new user. I have removed this entry
no, he just was being complete, making a user for bind -/
he already had root access ...
> Feb 20 13:37:34 xxxxx init: Switching to runlevel: 6
> Feb 20 13:37:34 xxxxx mgetty[610]: failed dev=ttyS0, pid=610, got signal
> 15, exiting
He's not too Raq savvvy tho, runlevel 6 isn't right ...
> Feb 20 13:37:42 xxxxx named[371]: named shutting down
lol...shot hisself in the foot
> Feb 24 05:15:01 xxxxx inetd[8722]: execv /usr/sbin/in.identd: No such
>
> This entry is there everywhere. Just wondering what is this> Is this
> file really missing??
That's a result of replacing your inetd.conf, you didn't have this in the
original...
I'd hazard a guess that the ftp logins have nothing to do with this guy...
> In general, the attempt has been to try for the IP address and if not
> possible, for the Host Name.
I suspect the fellow who got in went right for the nameserver without
touching anything else....
(But save everything , you never know what might turn out to be usefull
evidence....)
gsh