[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: compilation errors
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: compilation errors
- From: Johan-Kristian Wold <jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu Feb 22 04:45:02 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
In cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #2177, Stefan Osterlitz wrote:
<snip>
i would appreciate a firewall solution for a raq 3, too
<$0.02>
Generally - don't cook up something on a Raq3, install it alongside
the other services on the box and believe yourself safe. I don't
trust myself enough to let this be my only defense. From what I see
in the list, many "Appliance-drivers" should be careful about this
strategy too. The simple truth about network security is that it's a
full-time job (and I don't have enough time to be a full-time student
of internet security :^)
Portsentry, tripwire et al is good as a second line of defense, but
Preferably sent up a 3-zone firewall as a separate box, with internal
and external nets and the pubic servers (raqs) on a dmz. Use a "Deny
unless specifically allowed" policy, try to use automatic blocking
wherever possible, and NAT the internal network.
The firewall may be a linux-based solution (in that case, be _very_
sure of what you're doing - see above), an "appliance" (Cisco PIX,
Watchguard Firebox II etc.) or a software firewall (CheckPoint etc,
NOT a "personal" firewall).
Try to find a firewall that lets you proxy incoming services like
ftp, smtp etc. From my experience a product like the Cisco PIX or the
WatchGuard FireBox II should serve you well.
My strategy (has been for a long time) is to outsource DNS, and
consentrate on specific services (http, smtp and pop). Other
services, like incoming ftp or telnet is only allowed from specific
hosts upon an "as needed" basis.
</$0.02>
Johan-Kr
--
Johan-Kristian Wold, M.Sc. |
Computer systems administrator | Recursive: Adj. See recursive.
Nor-Trykk Narvik AS |
jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx | SAM007HM02