[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] Re: Backup question
- Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: Backup question
- From: Johan-Kristian Wold <jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Feb 19 05:03:40 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
In cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #2141, Richard Young wrote:
<snip>Has anyone used a NAS server (Like a SNAP Server)?
How do you back up a box and the individual sites?
We have a Cobalt NasRaQ server, which we back up using Legato
Networker. The backup works fine, and we can do restores of any given
version of individual files.
There is some mucking around to get Legato working - check my post in
the archives around 12 july 2000 for a description.
Legato is an expensive way to back up a server, so it's overkill to
buy it for just a single "el cheapo" NasRaq. Other options would be
Veritas and Arkeia, if you want a pre-packaged solution.
We were thinking of setting each site on a scheduled basis to back up to a
SNAP type server using ftp.
Would this work? How about performance?
If you can mount the remote server by NFS, you could tar or dump
directly to a file on the NFS volume. How this would work
performance-wise, I don't know - We haven't had the need for a hack
like this.
Then how would you be able to back up the rest of the box?
How is the restore done using this method - is it clean?
If you use dump, you can restore parts or whole parts of a
filesystem, using restore.
Needless to say, we are still looking for a cleaner solution.
Veritas, Arkeia or Legato is a cleaner solution, but maybe a bit
costly if you'r going to use em for a single server, and doesn't
already have some of the parts.
Johan-Kr
--
Johan-Kristian Wold, M.Sc. |
Computer systems administrator | Recursive: Adj. See recursive.
Nor-Trykk Narvik AS |
jkwold@xxxxxxxxxxx | SAM007HM02