Re: [cobalt-users] lame server

["Carrie Bartkowiak" <ravencarrie@xxxxxxxx>]

> >It's not your problem - a lame server is one that has been delegated a
> >domain that it's not authoritative for. Do nothing! If you really want to
> >find out about lame servers go to DejaNews in the comp.protocols.dns.bind
> >newsgroup and search on the term "lame"... You'll find a zillion messages
> >covering the topic..
>
> >http://www.deja.com/group/comp.protocols.dns.bind
>
> >But the short answer is: just ignore it..
>
> Just to add a little more info... this starting happening right around the
> time Windows 2000 started being deployed. Craig is right in that there is
> and was a huge discussion about this on deja.com.

A zillion messages is an understatement. :) What a wealth of info there!
Thanks... I'm gonna be browsing through that for days.
Wonder how Windows2000 screwed up its naming system? Weird.

Also gonna do some more digging to quiet down my logs a bit and get those
lame messages out of there since there's nothing I can do about it.

Carrie