Re: [cobalt-users] META FAQ Suggestion

["Zeffie" <cobaltlist@xxxxxxxx>]

> * Excellent writing (fluid, clear, correct)
> * Attention to detail and thoroughness
> * Moderate to high technical knowledge
>
> The reason I didn't say "tech-God" is that I'd rather have someone like
> Carrie (as an example) authorized to do this than Zeffie (again, as an
> example). Why? Carrie can ask Zeffie and others and get a
> technically-solid article created which is easy to read and understand.
> Zeffie, on the other hand, knows what he's talking about but has a
> stream-of-consciousness writing style that is clear but not ideal for
> what is essentially a teaching document.
>
> No offense, Zeffie, I'm trying to be constructive here.
>

I agree, I think carrie has a great writing ability and also has a
background that would allow the sometime hard to understand information I
present in a more understandable way....  My friends say "Don't teach" but
it's in my blood and I know that I assume too much sometimes and I think
carrie (for example) could point out many "Huh?s" in the writing... But at
the same time I have come from a background that allows me to understand
where many of the "newbies" are coming from...  But that aside I can't help
but feel that cobalt should do more to improve the KB using "inside
information" which stops us from assuming/guessing some of the details that
cobalt has not shared with us....

Zeffie