[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [cobalt-users] NEW Cobalt RaQ xtr
- Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] NEW Cobalt RaQ xtr
- From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz \(E-mail\)" <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri Jan 19 16:00:13 2001
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
I'll be nice to you in this post. :)
> Other than the price ($4799 and $5999, respectively),
> what is everyone's general opinion? Some comments:
First off, that I can't afford one. :)
> * why the move to the Pentium III over the AMD?
My speculation is that they had a Socket-7 board and discovered that the
K6-2 had good price/performance. Then, when choosing another platform,
for some reason they opted for the PIII over the Athlon Thunderbird.
Now, the Athlon is such a superior product to me (1.2 GHz for $300?
Wow...) that the only reason which pops to mind is again of motherboard
selection for some reason. But a motherboard with integrated video, dual
server network adapters, and perhaps integrated SCSI from Intel might
have pushed them in that direction.
> * the configurations ship with 2 and 3 drives; are
> these expressly for RAID, or is the idea to allow
> up to 120GB of internal storage through an arry?
You can get up to four drives. RAID-0 is a stripe, where all will become
a single 120 GB array. RAID-1 is a mirror, for two drives only. RAID-5
will use striping but will reserve one drive for checksum information,
so you'll get the capacity of N-1 drives. With four 30 GB drives, you'd
get 90 GB useful. But the fault-tolerance and the striping make for a
great package if you can afford to dispense with the storage space from
the last drive. RAID 0+1 is truly wasteful but also quite safe. You take
two drives and stripe them, then you mirror that entire array.
I presume that you can forgo RAID altogether... but there's no real
reason to do so. You want one drive, use RAID-0. You want RAID-5 (the
best if you can do it), great. You want middle-of the road... go 0+1. Do
not go for straight RAID-0; after all this is a webhost and
uptime/reliability are always #1.
> * BlueLinQ app delivery service -- seems like an
> auto-update/install feature for .pkg files? No
> offense to Cobalt, but we usually wait a week to
> see how many people get burned with the latest
> install, or if it gets pulled from the site...
Amen...
> Other than that, it looks like a nice machine, but I
> would have liked to see MySQL, servlets and JSP as some
> new features that are integrated for point/click install.
Amen as well...
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>