[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cobalt-users] Remove from list



----- Original Message -----
From: <cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 4:56 PM
Subject: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #1913 - 19 msgs


> Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. mail bouncing back (Sam Kennedy)
>    2. Cannot Remove Virtual Host (System Administrator)
>    3. Re: Webalizer Raq3 Logs (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Kristian_S=F8gaard?=)
>    4. Re: Speaking of a new Raq3 GUI being finished?!? (Charles Williams
 CEO ACNS ))
>    5. Webalizer for RAQ4? Does it exist? (System Administrator)
>    6. WAP on RAQ2 (Sean Rich)
>    7. Re: Reconfiguring Qpopper with tracing (Brian Curtis)
>    8. Re: Webalizer for RAQ4? Does it exist?
(=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Kristian_S=F8gaard?=)
>    9. Re: mail bouncing back (Pradeep Serro)
>   10. Correctio to my previous SSL email... (Brian Coughter)
>   11. Url rewriting (Daniel Mullin)
>   12. Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] Speaking of a new Raq3 GUI being
finished?!? (baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
>   13. Re: Any word on a RaQ 5 (Elwin Loomis)
>   14. RE: WAP on RAQ2 (Sean Rich)
>   15. RAQ3 Logs (James Thomas)
>   16. Re: RAQ3 Logs (MistaAviB@xxxxxxx)
>   17. (RaQ2) Bounced Mail From AOL (The IOLS Team (www.iols.net))
>   18. RE: RAQ3 Logs (James Thomas)
>   19. Real Easy Question (John Anderson)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> From: "Sam Kennedy" <cobalt-list@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:50:35 -0000
> Subject: [cobalt-users] mail bouncing back
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> What causes this error????
> ------------------------
> <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 212.67.196.171 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... Relaying
> denied.  Please check your mail first.
> Giving up on 212.67.196.171.
> -----------------------
>
> Configuration is exactly the same as another virtual domain which does not
> give an error.
>
> Sam
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> From: "System Administrator" <babymash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 01:08:35 +1300
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Cannot Remove Virtual Host
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I have an RAQ4 which has been working without any problems, however when I
> now try to remove a virtual host from within the web interface, the
> following error is displayed:
>
> "The system is busy deleting another site. Please wait and try again"
>
> The server does not appear to be busy in another process, however I have
had
> this problem for a few days now and cannot find a solution.
>
> Can you please help?
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Kristian_S=F8gaard?= <jens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Webalizer Raq3 Logs
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 13:06:34 +0100
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > The /home/sites/www.domain.com/logs/web.log read yesterday as zerok
> > And no updated webalizer pages, still showing the day before's
> > Today, the webalizer files have started afresh, and have forgotten the
> rest of January completely.
> > As you can imagine - unhappy customer.
>
> > Does anyone know why this might have occurred?
>
> Yes, it's a common problem with Cobalts PKG file for Webalizer.
>
> > Can I get the logs back?
>
> Well, you can unpack the gz file with this command:
>
> gunzip web.log.1.gz
>
> And then run webalizer manually on the file.
>
> > What is the web.log.1.gz file (I know it is an archive of the logs)
>
> It's yesterdays logs compressed.
>
> > Periodically, each site's web.log is archived into web.log.1.gz
> > Is this one permanent?
>
> No, the compressed file is also rotated when it comes too large.
>
> Normally, the Cobalt system sets off a maximum of 10% of the site quota
for
> logfiles.
>
> > What does Webalizer do? Does it keep its own seperate log files as well
as
> the graphs.
>
> It keeps a "summarized datafile" (i.e. not all information from the logs,
> but some statistical info which will enable it to show the desired graphs
> and data).
>
> If you're interested, we offer a Webalizer PKG that do not have this
problem
> for 25$. Please contact me offlist by email, if you want more information.
>
> --
> Jens Kristian Søgaard, Mermaid Consulting I/S,
> jens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> http://www.mermaidconsulting.com/
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> From: "Charles Williams \( CEO ACNS \)" <cwilliams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Speaking of a new Raq3 GUI being finished?!?
> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 17:14:21 +0100
> Organization: Accent Computer & Network Services
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Well, if this is the one I remember then noone that I know of will.  Then
> again if this is not the one located on the webmin website and it works
then
> it may be no problem.
>
> P.S. sorry for the top post.
>
> chuck
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kevin D" <kdlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 4:05 PM
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Speaking of a new Raq3 GUI being finished?!?
>
>
> > Have any of you ever heard of webmin? (www.webmin.com)
> >
> > "A powerful web-based administration interface for Unix systems. Using
> > Webmin you can configure DNS, Samba, NFS, local/remote filesystems and
> more
> > using your web browser."
> >
> > Granted, it seems a bit more complicated than the cobalt GUI because it
> > requires deeper knowledge of unix config, but it looks like that's what
> some
> > people on this list seem to want anyway.
> >
> > Like the cobalt GUI, it has to be run on apache running as root. It
> > reads/edits configuration files directly, so you may have to modify it
> some
> > to get it working on a cobalt, but it does have intrinsic support for
red
> > hat linux.
> >
> > I'm kinda hoping that someone here ventures to try it and is willing to
> tell
> > all about it :)
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: "System Administrator" <babymash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 01:48:41 +1300
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Webalizer for RAQ4? Does it exist?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Does Webalizer for the RAQ4 exist? If so, where can I download it. If it
> does not exist, is there a similar program someone can recommend?
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 07:59:41 -0500
> From: Sean Rich <srich@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-to: "srich@xxxxxxxxx" <srich@xxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: ERB Industries, Inc.
> Subject: [cobalt-users] WAP on RAQ2
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to create a wap enabled site, but can't seem to access it
using
> my SprintPCS phone. I get an error 1015: invalid content type.
>
> I can access the site using the UP.Simulator from the phone.com SDK, so I
> think that this might be due to some special RewriteCond required for
> SprintPCS.
>
> I have added the following mime types to the mime.types file:
>
> AddType text/vnd.wap.wml wml
> AddType application/vnd.wap.wmlc wmlc
> AddType text/vnd.wap.wmlscript wmls
> AddType application/vnd.wap.wmlscriptc wmlsc
> AddType image/vnd.wap.wbmp wbmp
>
> I have the following rewrite statements in srm.conf:
>
> # Catch most WAP browsers
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} text/vnd\.wap\.wml [OR]
> # WinWAP, WAPjag
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} wap [OR]
> # Nokia emulators (sdk)
> RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} 7110
> # Rewrite!!
> RewriteRule  ^[\./](.*)$                 /index.wml  [L]
>
>
> Any ideas? Anyone know how to clear the cache out of a web enabled phone?
> This problem may also be due to a previous(non-working) version of the
page
> being pulled from cache.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Sean
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:15:56 -0500
> From: Brian Curtis <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: Brian Curtis <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: Pomfret Computer Technologies, LLC
> To: Greg <gcaron@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Reconfiguring Qpopper with tracing
>
> Hello Greg,
>
> Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 5:07:41 PM, you wrote:
>
> G> We've been having an intermittent attachment problem on our RAQs. When
> G> customers send Excel files some of them are getting stripped or
corrupted.
> G> I've contacted Qualcomm about this and while they don't think it is
there
> G> problem, they suggested the following:
>
> You mention "sending" attachments here.  Are you sure it might not be
> a problem with sendmail?  Can they send the same attachment to
> themselves via your server and retrieve it successfully?  You could
> also have them send an attachment to someone on your server, then use
> a server-side MUA to extract the attachment directly on the server,
> then download the attachment using FTP to see if it was corrupted
> during the send phase.
>
> From the info you've provided, it could be a number of things ranging
> from the client's MUA, your MTA, a remote MTA, or anything in between.
> Have you narrowed down the problem at all?
>
> G> ------------------------------------------------
> G> To enable tracing in Qpopper:
> G> 1. Do a 'make clean'
> G> 2. Re-run ./configure, adding '--enable-debugging'.
> G> 3. Edit the inetd.conf line for Qpopper, adding '-d' or '-t tracefile'.
> G> 4. Send inetd a HUP signal.
> G> This causes detailed tracing to be written to the syslog (if you used
'-d')
> G> or to the file specified as 'tracefile'.
>
> G> You might want to put this Qpopper on a different port, and configure
the
> G> receiving Eudora to use that port.
> G> ------------------------------------------------
>
> This is a very viable solution.  Grab the source from
> http://www.eudora.com/qpopper/, read the included docs, and compile it
> with debugging turned on.
>
> To use the debugging version, one way would be to run it over the spop
> port through inetd (unless you're already running spop).  Stuff a line
> like the following into inetd.conf:
>
> spop3 stream  tcp  nowait  root  /path/to/debug_popper  qpopper -f
/path/to/debug_qpopper.conf
> (above should be all on one line)
>
> Modify the /path/to/debug_qpopper.conf to (optionally) include:
>
> set    debug        =true
> set    tracefile    =/path/to/tracefile
>
> Restart inetd and tell your client that's having problems to switch
> their MUA to pull mail from port 995.  Then inspect both the maillog
> and the tracefile.
>
> Alternatively, you can run qpopper as a standalone daemon if you so wish.
> Instructions are included with the source.
>
> G> Does anyone know if Qpopper was originally configured with debugging
turned
> G> on?
>
> I wouldn't think so.  Whenever you run a daemon in a "production"
> environment, you usually don't want debugging due to unnecessary
> overhead.  You would see additional output by qpopper every time
> someone connected to port 110 if debugging was compiled in, even if
> it's not being triggered by the necessary switches or config options.
>
> G> Anyone having any thoughts or suggestions?
>
> See first paragraph.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Brian Curtis
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jens_Kristian_S=F8gaard?= <jens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Webalizer for RAQ4? Does it exist?
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:05:43 +0100
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Does Webalizer for the RAQ4 exist? If so, where can I download it. If it
>
> Sure, you can use the same webalizer on RaQ4 as you use on RaQ3.
>
> Webalizer is downloadable from this website: http://www.mrunix.net/
>
> --
> Jens Kristian Søgaard, Mermaid Consulting I/S,
> jens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> http://www.mermaidconsulting.com/
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> From: "Pradeep Serro" <pradeep@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] mail bouncing back
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:18:42 +0530
> Organization: Serro Computers
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I had the same problem on my server...
>
> The problem is apparently a DNS error
>
> ie in the dns. the www record MUST be an A record pointing to the IP
address
> of the virtual site...
> Generally, www is a CNAME record, but if you make it a CNAME record,
cobalt
> does Not accept it!
>
> Hence, contact whoever has created your dns entries and ask them to change
> the www record from a CNAME record to an A record pointing to the IP
> address... That should solve the problem !
>
> Pradeep
>
> How much are you paying for your web hosting ??
> If you are paying anything.... Then you are paying too much !!!!
> Serro Computers, now introduces.... FREE WEB HOSTING !!!
> http://www.freewebhosting4all.com
> admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Kennedy <cobalt-list@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:20 PM
> Subject: [cobalt-users] mail bouncing back
>
>
> > What causes this error????
> > ------------------------
> > <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > 212.67.196.171 does not like recipient.
> > Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 <test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>... Relaying
> > denied.  Please check your mail first.
> > Giving up on 212.67.196.171.
> > -----------------------
> >
> > Configuration is exactly the same as another virtual domain which does
not
> > give an error.
> >
> > Sam
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:56:08 -0500
> From: Brian Coughter <brianc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Correctio to my previous SSL email...
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In a previous message posting a short tutorial on my experiences with SSL
I
> wrote:
>
> PLEASE NOTE:  It is a good idea to immediately delete the certificate from
> the SSL Settings GUI after you copy it.  Just so you don't forget.
>
> THIS IS NO NOT GOOD PRACTICE.
>
> Do NOT delete the Certificate request that you generate.  I didn't know
this
> at first and I thank Bryan K. for flagging it for me.
>
> The reason is because the Certificate, after you get it signed by
Verisign,
> has to be paired up with the csr (Certificate Signing Request) that you
> generated.  If it is not there then your new SSL will NOT work at all.
That
> would require you to re-create a new csr and resubmit it to VeriSign.
>
> I apologize if this previous posting messed anyone up.  This was my first
> time doing it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian J. Coughter
> Internet Services
>
> Blue Water Graphics, Inc.
> 7977 SW Jack James Drive
> Stuart, Florida 34997
>
> 561-286-2249  (Tel)
> 561-286-3055  (Fax)
>
> brianc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 14:11:11 +0000
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Daniel Mullin <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Url rewriting
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >Hello all,
>
> finally got my mits on my first RAQ4,
> and now I need some help,
> installed mysql,
> doddle,
> php running fine.
> liking this so far,
> but...
>
> I need to redirect a tld to another on the domain...
>
> eg
>
> www.mysite.co.uk needs to direct straight away to
> www.mysite.com which is on the same box,
>
> I would prefer to not use a click here or content refresh page,
> and would like to rewrite the url upon receipt of the httpd request,
> I have access to the name servers but though best to ask you all
> first and find out whether using mod_rewrite or something similar is
> a better idea?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Danny
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> From: baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:36:46 -0500 (EST)
> To: Brian Curtis <admin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc: Kevin D <kdlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] Speaking of a new Raq3 GUI being
finished?!?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Brian Curtis wrote:
> >
> > You can run both simultaneously, you just have to be careful
> > what you edit with Webmin.
>
> It would be very helpful if folks who do/have run both webmin and the
> cobalt gue could detail
>
> A. What webmin functions you can run without trashing the cobalt files
> B. What webmin functions you shouldn't run
>
> Thom
>
>
././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././././
> baltimoremd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx             Thom LaCosta K3HRN Webmaster
>
> http://www.baltimoremd.com/             Baltimore's Home Page
> http://www.baltimorehon.com/            Home of the Baltimore Lexicon
> http://www.zerobeat.net                 Home of The QRP Web Ring
>                                         and Drake Mail List Pages
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 08:19:22 -0600
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: Elwin Loomis <espam@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: Any word on a RaQ 5
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Since the Sun Acquisition I would have thought it would be called a Netra
T-1..
>
> ohh ahh... ouch.. ok .. bad joke...
>
> elwin
>
> >
> >  I've heard there is a new RaQ coming out this month but not sure if
they
> are
> >  calling it a RaQ 5 or something else.  Told it's got upwards of 1 GH
> >  processor and RAID 5 configuration.  Is any of this true and if so when
> will
> >  it be available?
> >
> >  John Baine
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:35:08 -0500
> From: Sean Rich <srich@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] WAP on RAQ2
> To: Cobalt User Group <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-to: "srich@xxxxxxxxx" <srich@xxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: ERB Industries, Inc.
>
> "...it is not sufficient to simply configure the server for WAP. The
> content must also be relayed through a WAP portal"
>
> Can anyone confirm/deny this? According to my research any web server can
> serve up WML pages, no need to go through a special portal. But then
again,
> my site ain't workin' quite right. (-:
>
> Oh yeah, I forgot the following that I also added to the srm.conf:
>
> #ADD WAP STUFF
> AddType text/vnd.wap.wml wml
> AddType application/vnd.wap.wmlc wmlc
> AddType text/vnd.wap.wmlscript wmls
> AddType application/vnd.wap.wmlscriptc wmlsc
> AddType image/vnd.wap.wbmp wbmp
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> From: James Thomas <james@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:12:35 -0500
> Subject: [cobalt-users] RAQ3 Logs
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> This is my first post to this list, so please cut me some slack if I am
> asking something that has gone before.
>
> Specific situation is:
>
> Just migrated a customer from a RAQ2 to a RAQ3i.  They have a fairly busy
> single web site (approx 12,000 visitors weekly).  On the RAQ2, we had a
> routine of downloading web log files on a weekly basis.  The files would
> typically be about 100MB in size.
> Now on the RAQ3, the log file is rolling over every day (at approx. 4am).
> If we do not download the file daily, we risk losing valuable log data.
>
> Is there any way to get the RAQ3i to produce logs on a weekly basis so we
> can get back to the routine that worked for everyone concerned.  Or does
> anyone have any other suggestions / workarounds.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> James Thomas
>
> Morgan Johnson USA Inc.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> From: MistaAviB@xxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:16:50 EST
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ3 Logs
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In a message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2001  9:42:20 AM Eastern Standard Time,
James
> Thomas <james@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> << This is my first post to this list, so please cut me some slack if I am
> asking something that has gone before.
>
> Specific situation is:
>
> Just migrated a customer from a RAQ2 to a RAQ3i.  They have a fairly busy
> single web site (approx 12,000 visitors weekly).  On the RAQ2, we had a
> routine of downloading web log files on a weekly basis.  The files would
> typically be about 100MB in size.
> Now on the RAQ3, the log file is rolling over every day (at approx. 4am).
> If we do not download the file daily, we risk losing valuable log data.
>
> Is there any way to get the RAQ3i to produce logs on a weekly basis so we
> can get back to the routine that worked for everyone concerned.  Or does
> anyone have any other suggestions / workarounds.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> James Thomas
>
> Morgan Johnson USA Inc.
> >>
>
> Hi. We had the same problem. We setup apache to log that domain
specifically
> to a different log file. This probably will void your warranty (useless
> unless it's been less than 30 days, or you wanna pay $200). If you need
the
> details on exactly how, email me off the list :-)
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 17
> From: "The IOLS Team \(www.iols.net\)" <info@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:36:47 -0600
> Subject: [cobalt-users] (RaQ2) Bounced Mail From AOL
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hello All,
>
> This list has been most helpful in the past in resolving issues with our
servers.  Most times my questions are addressed before I have time to ask
them.
>
> A few of our hosting customers are getting the following error messages
when sending email through their AOL accounts.  It appears that this just
started happening since we have not had the problem before.
>
> Below is a copy (Edited) of one of the replies from a bounced message.
The IP Address is not one of ours.
>
> ---------------------
> The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected
by
> the server. The rejected e-mail address was 'y(edited)y@xxxxxxx'. Subject
> 'test', Account: '207.208.8.251', Server: '207.208.8.251', Protocol: SMTP,
> Server Response: '550 <y(edited)y@xxxxxxx>... Relaying denied.  Please POP
> before sending.', Port: 25, Secure(SSL): No, Server Error: 550, Error
Number:
> 0x800CCC79
> ---------------------
>
> Any ideas?  Thanks!
>
> Sincerely,
> Sandy
> The IOLS Team
> Inet OnLine Services
> Internet Solutions... Today
> http://www.iols.com & http://www.iols.net
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 18
> From: James Thomas <james@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "'cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ3 Logs
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:14:04 -0500
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
> It has been more than 30 days, so warranty isn't an issue.  I would be
> grateful for info on how you made it work.
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MistaAviB@xxxxxxx [mailto:MistaAviB@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 10:17 AM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ3 Logs
>
>
> In a message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2001  9:42:20 AM Eastern Standard Time,
James
>
> Thomas <james@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> << This is my first post to this list, so please cut me some slack if I am
> asking something that has gone before.
>
> Specific situation is:
>
> Just migrated a customer from a RAQ2 to a RAQ3i.  They have a fairly busy
> single web site (approx 12,000 visitors weekly).  On the RAQ2, we had a
> routine of downloading web log files on a weekly basis.  The files would
> typically be about 100MB in size.
> Now on the RAQ3, the log file is rolling over every day (at approx. 4am).
> If we do not download the file daily, we risk losing valuable log data.
>
> Is there any way to get the RAQ3i to produce logs on a weekly basis so we
> can get back to the routine that worked for everyone concerned.  Or does
> anyone have any other suggestions / workarounds.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> James Thomas
>
> Morgan Johnson USA Inc.
> >>
>
> Hi. We had the same problem. We setup apache to log that domain
specifically
>
> to a different log file. This probably will void your warranty (useless
> unless it's been less than 30 days, or you wanna pay $200). If you need
the
> details on exactly how, email me off the list :-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 10:44:14 -0500
> From: John Anderson <johna@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Real Easy Question
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi,
>
> I've got a really easy question.
>
> My company is moving this Friday and we have a Cobalt Qube that we're
> using as a proxy / dhcp server.
>
> My question is setup related.  Currently we are on a dynamic IP address
> DSL modem, we are moving to a T1 with static IPs.
>
> The secondary interface is what connects to the DSL modem (currently)
> and the Router in our new facility.
>
> Do I set the IP and Subnet (in the admin toolkit) to the IP and Subnet
> of the IP address I want to use?  (Like I said, easy question).
>
> That's it.  Thanks.
>
>
> --John
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> John Anderson
> janderson@xxxxxxxxx
> Ceeva, Inc.
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> End of cobalt-users Digest