[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] You should monitor port 80 on each virtual site?
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] You should monitor port 80 on each virtual site?
- From: Rik Thomas <rikt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Dec 27 16:53:17 2000
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, R Duncan wrote:
> I have a question regarding monitoring. Is it possible for port 80,25,443
> to fail on one virtual site only? Or would the port failure cause the port
> to go down on each virtual site? I'm wondering if it makes sense to monitor
> the ports for each virtual site or does it make sense to just monitor the
> ports on the primary site? Any help is appreciated. Thanks.
>
> Richard Duncan
> info@xxxxxxxxxx
Since all of your sites are virtual the daemon would have to fail and it
would fail for all of them. We just monitor the main IP address of the
server for all of the service ports.
--
Rik Thomas CTO rikt@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Delaware.Net, Inc. http://www.delaware.net
P:302.736.5515 F:302.736.5945 ICQ:879956
--
$20 Domains!!! http://register.delaware.net