[cobalt-users] mysterious domain forwarding

["Sputnik Internet" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am currently hosting www.freerangedesign.com

Sometimes when I type in www.freerangedesign.com/psigate, it tries to take
me to www.bentleysark.co.uk/psigate
(bentleysark is another domain I host) The I obviously get a File not found
error.

Can anyone fill me in on why this is happening?

Cheers

P

-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Baker -
Cobalt Lists
Sent: 29 November 2000 01:43
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ3-en-System-3.0.5-6375.pkg - Just applied
it and it shut me down.


Hi,

I don't normally speak out like this but I am quite discussed that cobalt
will release patches that cause damage to their customers machines!
Why can't they test them? A group of 10 different RaQs for them to test on
wouldn't cost them a penny but I'm sure would save a lot of problems!

Also why does it take so long for a patch to be released? Do they rush them
last minute? Is this why there are so many problems!

Quite frankly cobalt I would have expected better, every patch you release
has a bug or problem. The machines you make are great, why can't the updates
be like them?

Regards,

Mark Baker
http://www.yoursitehere.co.uk

Reply e-mail address: mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
From: David Etheridge <DavidE@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2000 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RaQ3-en-System-3.0.5-6375.pkg - Just applied it
and it shut me down.


> Aren't the updates supported by Cobalt. If so I think compensation is in
> order as the poor souls who have lost their server(s) will surely have to
> compensate their customers or the effect on their businesses etc.
>
> I never apply patches until I see how they are reported on here. I can't
> afford a second RaQ3 just to test Cobalt patches.
>
> Dave Etheridge
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David [mailto:david_dean@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 29 November 2000 08:26
> To: Cobalt User Group
> Subject: [cobalt-users] RaQ3-en-System-3.0.5-6375.pkg - Just applied it
> and it shut me down.
>
>
> >> To log into the box in single user mode do the following:
> >>
> >> 1)connect a serial null-modem cable to the first serial
> >> port of the raq and your pc.  Using 115200, 8, N, 1,
> >> hardware flow control
> >
> >fortunately i did not install the upgrade yet, as temporarily
> >i`m about 600 miles away from my raq... what`s the max. length
> >of a serial cross-connection... ?
>
> Oh... my, my, my... This really is disgusting! I mean seeing this and what
> these
> poor souls are going through is just unacceptable....  I TRUELY feel for
you
> individuals that got sucker by Cobalt's shitting programming (again)...
> I've
> been down that road from Cobalt "patches/upgrades" more times than I care
to
> remember... When I ran across this new (latest) version of the patch on
> their
> download section of the Cobalt site, I thought to myself:
>
> "THERE'S NO WAY IN HELL I WOULD TOUCH THAT .PKG WITH A TEN FOOT POLE!!!"
>
> Tomorrow, I will be reading about how it broke some poor admin's server
who
> applied it... I'm curious, what is this now, the 4th, 5th time they've
tired
> to
> get it right with this patch..?? If I were Cobalt, I think I would start
to
> rethink my logging and reporting approach to these machines... Obviously
> it's
> been one of the weaker areas of the box since the day they hit the
street!!
> Patch, after patch, upgrade, after upgrade, poor admin's losing customer,
> after customer - and all because of no QT from Cobalt in ANY WAY with any
of
> these patch releases. That's just truly sad!
>
> I mean - that just really sucks out-loud, but not that it wasn't expected,
> at
> least by those of us who've been around Cobalt for a while, but that's
just
> plain NEGELGIENCE. There can be NO DOUBT in any of our minds, Cobalt
simply
> DOES ****NOT**** engage in Quality Control testing before releasing this
> shit
> on the masses!!! There's NO WAY they possibly could, or they would have
> known
> that by simply installing this latest patch - it completely trashed the
box
> so
> damn bad you need a serial cable to get it going again!!  < My god! >
I've
> always wondered if they really do QT, they've always claimed they do, but
> obviously that's pure BS.
>
> Man.... I tell you what... if I had 600 customer's web sites that were
down
> because of this kind of gross negligence, they'd be speaking with my
atty's
> for damages, PERIOD <dot, dot, dot>...!  But I've been there, done that,
and
> I've learned (recite mantra in unison):
>
> NEVER INSTALL COBALT UPDATES/UPGRADES FOR AT LEAST ONE MONTH -
REGARDLESS!!
>
> I guess that leaves us with - who then will test the darn things..??? It
> really is sad... But I'm going to personally start rethinking my Cobalt
> direction, there's just too many new 1U units on the market today that
won't
> cost you your entire customer base because of crap like this....
>
> Good luck to those of you in this situation, I truly feel for you..!!
>
> -David
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users

_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users