[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cobalt-users] RE: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #1468 - 24 msgs
- Subject: [cobalt-users] RE: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #1468 - 24 msgs
- From: Christine MRecher <christinem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed Oct 11 17:12:08 2000
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
I did try to Unsubscribe - I entered my email address - it claims that it is
not valid
-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 2:50 PM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #1468 - 24 msgs
Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Shutting down the Qube (Dom Latter)
2. RE: Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision (rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
3. RE: .htaccess doesnt do anything (Alex Lee)
4. Re: [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error (Graeme Fowler)
5. [Qube2] Kernel message every 3-4 minutes? [Repost with Qube2 in
sub] (Clyde McQueen)
6. Re: [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error (Lennie Core)
7. RE: Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision (Lyle Scheer)
8. RE: Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision (Lyle Scheer)
9. Re: [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error (Theodore Jones)
10. Re: Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision (Theodore Jones)
11. Re: OPen SSL admin errors (Jeff Bilicki)
12. RE: RAQ3] Unable to create Users with FrontPage enabled (Jeff Bilicki)
13. What is AuthPAM_Enabled (Scott Rader)
14. Re: Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision (Theodore Jones)
15. Re: [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error (Jeff Bilicki)
16. RE: .htaccess doesnt do anything (Patrick McNeil)
17. (no subject) (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6ll?=)
18. RE: What is AuthPAM_Enabled (Dan Kriwitsky)
19. Re: [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error (Theodore Jones)
20. RE: .htaccess doesnt do anything (Dan Kriwitsky)
21. PHP4 und Zope on RaQ2 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6ll?=)
22. Re[2]: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything (Florian
Effenberger)
23. RE: What is AuthPAM_Enabled (Scott Rader)
--__--__--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:21:55 +0100
From: Dom Latter <d.latter@xxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Shutting down the Qube
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jeff Lasman wrote:
>
> # find / -name shutdown
Bzzt! "locate shutdown | less"
"locate" works on a compiled database of filenames, and so is quick and
neither CPU nor disk intensive. "find" will actually search the disk
in real time.
--
Dom.
--__--__--
Message: 2
From: <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:15:59 -0500
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Theodore said:
> It seems to me your reasoning could work in the opposite
> direction also however.... SUN
> could have bought Cobalt because they did not >want< to have
> to inovate or create two
> different products, and so they bought Cobalt out so that
> they could swallow it in and
> quietly scuttle it...?
There may be good and bad things in store, but of this I do
feel certain: Sun will not "scuttle" Cobalt. They may screw
it up, but that's another matter. But no one pays $2 billion
for something you're going to trash...
--
Rodolfo J. Paiz
rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: "Alex Lee" <alee@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:27:08 +0200
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I am trying to password protect a directory. I made the .htaccess file in
> >the directory and put the following in it:
> >
> ># Access file
> >order allow,deny
> >allow from all
> >require valid-user
> >Authname DirectoryName
> >Authtype Basic
> >AuthUserFile /home/sites/sitename/users/username/.htpasswd
> >
> >this is the exact syntaxt found on the cobalt.com knowledgebase. but it
> >never prompts for the username/password.
> >what am i missing?
> >
> >Patrick
>
> Did you create the .htpasswd file in the users directory. That's
> sounds like
> what you're missing.
>
> type /usr/sbin/htpasswd --help for help
> but try /usr/sbin/htpasswd -c /home/sites/site/users/username/.htpasswd
> Must be SU
you need
AuthPAM_Enabled off
as well in your .htaccess
--__--__--
Message: 4
From: "Graeme Fowler" <graeme.f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:34:54 +0100
Organization: WebFusion Internet Solutions
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Theo wrote:
> I'm trying to get a script running and get this error, which I do not
> know how to decipher:
>
> [Tue Oct 10 09:09:06 2000] [error] [client <ip address>] Premature
> end of script headers: /usr/cgiwrap/cgiwrap
Usually indicates a broken script. Look in the lines immediately
preceding the cgiwrap message for further info.
If your script is in Perl, try running it from the command line:
# perl script.pl
If you're lucky, it'll bin out with an error message. If not, enter the
appropriate name/value pairs and press CTL-D to make it run. Then look
for the error message.
HTH
Graeme
--__--__--
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:40:42 -0700
From: Clyde McQueen <mcqueen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Cobalt <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cobalt-users] [Qube2] Kernel message every 3-4 minutes? [Repost
with Qube2 in
sub]
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Whoops - I meant to add [Qube2] in the subject.
----------
From: Clyde McQueen <mcqueen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:14:16 -0700
To: Cobalt <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Qube Users
<qube-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Kernel message every 3-4 minutes?
I'm trying to track down a software problem, and I noticed that
/var/log/messages is filled with the same Kernel messages every 3-4 minutes.
Is this normal?
Oct 9 19:58:05 garfield kernel: Swansea University Computer Society IPX
0.34 for NET3.035
Oct 9 19:58:05 garfield kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera,
Inc.
Oct 9 20:04:46 garfield kernel: Swansea University Computer Society IPX
0.34 for NET3.035
Oct 9 20:04:46 garfield kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera,
Inc.
Oct 9 20:11:27 garfield kernel: Swansea University Computer Society IPX
0.34 for NET3.035
Oct 9 20:11:27 garfield kernel: IPX Portions Copyright (c) 1995 Caldera,
Inc.
.... and so on and so forth.
Thanks in advance.
/Clyde
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: "Lennie Core" <lcore@xxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:39:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
First be sure your first line is pointing to perl on your machine:
#!/usr/bin/perl
Second, be sure the script has a correct ending.
Look at other scripts and use the last line to see if it's correct.
Cheers, Lennie
Hello All,
I'm trying to get a script running and get this error, which I do not
know how to decipher:
[Tue Oct 10 09:09:06 2000] [error] [client <ip address>] Premature
end of script headers: /usr/cgiwrap/cgiwrap
I am already searching for an answer at the CGIWRAP documentation site,
but thougth I would throw this out in case anybody had a quick answer.
It's time-critical that I launch this script this morning (and what's
new!?).
Thanks!,
~ Theo
_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
---------------------------------------------------
Lennie Core, Ceo
Coreave.com, Design & Hosting
757-442-6240
http://coreave.com
--__--__--
Message: 7
From: "Lyle Scheer" <lyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:49:32 -0700
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lyle,
>
> It seems to me your reasoning could work in the opposite
> direction also however.... SUN
> could have bought Cobalt because they did not >want< to have
> to inovate or create two
> different products, and so they bought Cobalt out so that
> they could swallow it in and
> quietly scuttle it...?
Sure, if you believe they'd pay 2 Billion dollars to scuttle a product they
didn't like. That doesn't sound like good business to me, however.
> The reason people are getting so bent is because the CEO of
> the company clearly stated,
> not just in an "ify" way that their intention >is< to kill
> the Linux implimentation of
> Cobalt appliances off in favor of their unix flavor...
FUD? I hadn't heard that the Mcnealy made any such statement. Can you show
me the article that quotes the CEO?
- Lyle
--__--__--
Message: 8
From: "Lyle Scheer" <lyle@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:59:33 -0700
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >The reason people are getting so bent is because the CEO of
> the company
> clearly >stated,
> >not just in an "ify" way that their intention >is< to kill the Linux
> >implimentation of
> >Cobalt appliances off in favor of their unix flavor...
>
> And in fact I read an article the other day on network
> appliances (on zdnet
> I believe) in which Sun stated the next versions of the Raq
> and Qube will
> run Solaris, not Linux ! --->Cobalt support feel free to
> verify or deny
> <-----
You are misquoting and increasing FUD.
http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2949002.html?pt.yfin.cat_fin.txt.ne
Ah yes, the cnet article, which I will provide the reference for you. Note
very carefully that the article does *not* say "sun stated" or attribute any
quote at all. From what I can tell, the author of the article states the
shift to ultrasparc.
I don't claim to know and would not admit proprietary information even if I
did know. I'm not sure you can assert from that article that any reputable
source has put their stamp on it.
- Lyle
--__--__--
Message: 9
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:05:58 -0700
From: Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Graeme,
Thanks. I'll try your suggestions
> > [Tue Oct 10 09:09:06 2000] [error] [client <ip address>] Premature
> > end of script headers: /usr/cgiwrap/cgiwrap
>
> Usually indicates a broken script. Look in the lines immediately
> preceding the cgiwrap message for further info.
>
> If your script is in Perl, try running it from the command line:
>
> # perl script.pl
>
> If you're lucky, it'll bin out with an error message. If not, enter the
> appropriate name/value pairs and press CTL-D to make it run. Then look
> for the error message.
>
> HTH
>
> Graeme
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--__--__--
Message: 10
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:59:30 -0700
From: Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> There may be good and bad things in store, but of this I do
> feel certain: Sun will not "scuttle" Cobalt. They may screw
> it up, but that's another matter. But no one pays $2 billion
> for something you're going to trash...
I agree. Perhaps it's worth it to them to "buy up" the Cobalt/Linux
user-base so that they can heard previous users along with those who
just bought in on the new RaQ4s into experiencing a "real" OS like
Solaris then? Perhaps that's the strategy? In the long run it sounds
like it would pay off because all of these new users would probably be
bound to have troubles and need to call and have pay-for services
performed for them..? From the comments I've allready heard on this
subject, it has sounded like Sun exacts a stiff price for any support
help it hands out beyond the basics?
~ Theo
--__--__--
Message: 11
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:58:14 -0700
From: Jeff Bilicki <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] OPen SSL admin errors
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This is active monitor checking to see if the server is running.
You can safely ignore these messages
> Can anyone tell me where these errors are coming from in my
> admin_error log and possibly how to fix it ? Thanks in advance..
> Lennie
> [Tue Oct 10 08:00:01 2000] [error] mod_ssl: SSL
> handshake failed: HTTP spoken on HTTPS port;
> trying to send HTML error page (OpenSSL library
> error follows)
--__--__--
Message: 12
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 09:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jeff Bilicki <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: John Cordeiro <jcordeiro@xxxxxxxx>
cc: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ3] Unable to create Users with FrontPage
enabled
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Please make sure you have update 3.0 install, I have list possible
solutions below.
Frontpage take around 3MB of space to install, if the
users are close to the quota it could cause this.
Make sure there are no _vti* or _private directories in the users web root
when fpx is disabled.
Send me the output of /var/cobalt/sauce.log when attempting to enable fpx.
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, John Cordeiro wrote:
> Jeff:
> I'm still unable to create users with FP Webs. I can remove and add FP
Webs
> to existing users however, I can no longer create new users with FP Webs.
> Nor can I add FP Webs to the last 2 users I've created or any new users I
> try to create. The system creates the user and returns the error "Unable
to
> create FP Web". The users appear in the GUI. I fell the database link is
> broken some how. Any Ideas?
>
> Johnc
>
--__--__--
Message: 13
From: "Scott Rader" <slr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cobalt-users] What is AuthPAM_Enabled
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:21:39 -0700
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Alex
Lee
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 9:27 AM
> ...
> you need
>
> AuthPAM_Enabled off
>
> as well in your .htaccess
I have seen a number of posts suggesting the inclusion of
AuthPAM_Enabled but I cannot find any description of this
directive at the Apache site. Could someone please help me to
understand what this directive actually does? Thanks... -Scott.
--__--__--
Message: 14
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:26:43 -0700
From: Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Sun Solaris??? Bad Business Decision
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Last week, senior Sun executives said that although the firm's
strategy with Cobalt has not been decided, they were leaning
toward replacing Linux with a version of Solaris that is optimised
for appliances. An appliance-specific version of Solaris is already
under development, said Andy Ingram, senior vice president for
Solaris.
"Cobalt's [devices] are true appliances," Ingram said. "You do not
care about the operating system. If we were to convert these over
to Solaris, the end-user wouldn't care. We don't have the energy
to drive two operating systems." <<<
http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/2000/38/ns-18191.html
Lyle Scheer wrote:
> > >The reason people are getting so bent is because the CEO of
> > the company
> > clearly >stated,
> > >not just in an "ify" way that their intention >is< to kill the Linux
> > >implimentation of
> > >Cobalt appliances off in favor of their unix flavor...
> >
> > And in fact I read an article the other day on network
> > appliances (on zdnet
> > I believe) in which Sun stated the next versions of the Raq
> > and Qube will
> > run Solaris, not Linux ! --->Cobalt support feel free to
> > verify or deny
> > <-----
>
> You are misquoting and increasing FUD.
>
> http://yahoo.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2949002.html?pt.yfin.cat_fin.txt.ne
>
> Ah yes, the cnet article, which I will provide the reference for you.
Note
> very carefully that the article does *not* say "sun stated" or attribute
any
> quote at all. From what I can tell, the author of the article states the
> shift to ultrasparc.
>
> I don't claim to know and would not admit proprietary information even if
I
> did know. I'm not sure you can assert from that article that any
reputable
> source has put their stamp on it.
>
> - Lyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--__--__--
Message: 15
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 10:10:54 -0700
From: Jeff Bilicki <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Make sure you have the following line before any other print
command.
print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
Jeff-
> Hello All,
> I'm trying to get a script running and get this error, which I do not
> know how to decipher:
> [Tue Oct 10 09:09:06 2000] [error] [client <ip address>] Premature
> end of script headers: /usr/cgiwrap/cgiwrap
> I am already searching for an answer at the CGIWRAP documentation site,
> but thougth I would throw this out in case anybody had a quick answer.
> It's time-critical that I launch this script this morning (and what's
> new!?).
> Thanks!,
> ~ Theo
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--__--__--
Message: 16
From: "Patrick McNeil" <pmcneil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:44:36 -0500
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I added this, but it still doesn't require authentication.
-----Original Message-----
From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Alex Lee
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:27 AM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything
> >I am trying to password protect a directory. I made the .htaccess file in
> >the directory and put the following in it:
> >
> ># Access file
> >order allow,deny
> >allow from all
> >require valid-user
> >Authname DirectoryName
> >Authtype Basic
> >AuthUserFile /home/sites/sitename/users/username/.htpasswd
> >
> >this is the exact syntaxt found on the cobalt.com knowledgebase. but it
> >never prompts for the username/password.
> >what am i missing?
> >
> >Patrick
>
> Did you create the .htpasswd file in the users directory. That's
> sounds like
> what you're missing.
>
> type /usr/sbin/htpasswd --help for help
> but try /usr/sbin/htpasswd -c /home/sites/site/users/username/.htpasswd
> Must be SU
you need
AuthPAM_Enabled off
as well in your .htaccess
_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
--__--__--
Message: 17
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6ll?= <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 19:42:36 +0200
Subject: [cobalt-users] (no subject)
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
confirm 663053
--__--__--
Message: 18
From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] What is AuthPAM_Enabled
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 13:53:41 -0400
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I have seen a number of posts suggesting the inclusion of
> AuthPAM_Enabled but I cannot find any description of this
> directive at the Apache site. Could someone please help me to
> understand what this directive actually does? Thanks... -Scott.
>
Here's some info. Also, see the user archives.
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/User-Authentication-HOWTO/x302.html
--
Dan Kriwitsky
--__--__--
Message: 19
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:09:24 -0700
From: Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] [RaQ3i] - cgiwrap error
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes,
that's in there. thanks,
~ T
Jeff Bilicki wrote:
> Make sure you have the following line before any other print
> command.
>
> print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
>
> Jeff-
--__--__--
Message: 20
From: "Dan Kriwitsky" <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 14:05:49 -0400
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I added this, but it still doesn't require authentication.
>
Check your .conf files. I believe it's srm.conf or access.conf. Look for
AllowOverride it should be all not none. This was just discussed on the
list.
Please reply below previous replies and trim the excess sig info. Read one
of the digest versions to find out why this is a good thing.
--
Dan Kriwitsky
--__--__--
Message: 21
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sebastian_D=F6ll?= <seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:16:57 +0200
Subject: [cobalt-users] PHP4 und Zope on RaQ2
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hi,
does anybody knowes where i can get the php4
module for the apache server for the raq2.
i want to update the installes packege from the cobalt
ftp server.
my last question, has anybody of you installed
zope on a raq2 successfully?
bigthx
cu
--
GlobalNetwork.project.......
Sebastian Döll . Projektmanager/Webmaster
W.- Shakespeare Str. 26
99425 Weimar . Germany
phone: +49 3643 - 53256 . fax: -854412
mobile: +49 177 - 7644627
mailto:seb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-+-There is a difference between
knowing the path and walking the path-+-
--__--__--
Message: 22
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 20:17:12 +0200
From: Florian Effenberger <florian.effenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Patrick McNeil <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] .htaccess doesnt do anything
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I use this on a RaQ3:
order allow,deny
allow from all
require valid-user
authname "Protected Area"
authpam_enabled off
authtype basic
authuserfile /home/sites/www.mysite.com/.htuser
--__--__--
Message: 23
From: "Scott Rader" <slr@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] What is AuthPAM_Enabled
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 11:40:47 -0700
Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
> Of Dan Kriwitsky
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 10:54 AM
> ...
> Here's some info. Also, see the user archives.
>
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/User-Authentication-HOWTO/x302.html
Thanks Dan... This is very helpful... -Scott.
--__--__--
_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
End of cobalt-users Digest