Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ 2 - name-based

["Tim M. Muldoon" <muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

>I'd like to hear from anyone who is currently using
> name-based hosting if their are any drawbacks.

The two biggest seem to be that you need an individual IP for each instance
of Anonymous FTP and SSL.

I have been running a RaQ for about a month and have been using it for the
simplest of sites without any problems. (that I didn't create on my own).

Tim
muldoon@xxxxxxxxxxx

www.raqresources.com by a newbie - for newbies

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brandon Keim" <brandon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 6:55 AM
Subject: [cobalt-users] RaQ 2 - name-based


> Hi,
>
> I've read through many previous newsgroup postings regarding this, and
many
> sites on the web.  I'd like to hear from anyone who is currently using
> name-based hosting if their are any drawbacks.  I understand that some
> browsers will no be able to see the sites, but I was told that was
browsers
> under 2.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Brandon Keim
> Webxonline.com
> 1(888)290-0879
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users