[cobalt-users] Error "...canonical name" in message log.

["joerg2" <joerg2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

This ist var/log/messages looks like:

Aug 30 15:53:09 mycompany in.qpopper[11369]: @[192.168.168.78]: -ERR Unknown
command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:53:18 mycompany in.qpopper[11373]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:53:18 mycompany in.qpopper[11373]: @[192.168.168.95]: -ERR Unknown
command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:54:21 mycompany in.qpopper[11357]: @[192.168.168.125]: -ERR POP
EOF received
Aug 30 15:56:25 mycompany in.qpopper[11390]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:56:25 mycompany in.qpopper[11390]: @[192.168.168.47]: -ERR Unknown
command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:56:29 mycompany in.qpopper[11387]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:56:31 mycompany in.qpopper[11392]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:56:38 mycompany in.qpopper[11391]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:56:52 mycompany in.qpopper[11393]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:56:52 mycompany in.qpopper[11393]: @[192.168.168.51]: -ERR Unknown
command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:57:35 mycompany in.qpopper[11398]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:57:41 mycompany in.qpopper[11400]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:57:48 mycompany in.qpopper[11401]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:57:48 mycompany in.qpopper[11401]: @[192.168.168.56]: -ERR Unknown
command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:58:17 mycompany in.qpopper[11409]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2
Aug 30 15:58:17 mycompany in.qpopper[11409]: @[192.168.168.136]: -ERR
Unknown command: "capa".
Aug 30 15:58:20 mycompany in.qpopper[11410]: (v2.53) Unable to get canonical
name of client, err = 2

... on our cobalt cube 2. We´re using mostly macs and eudora as
email-client.
Is that OK?
We´ve got a problem: Eudora sometimes needs mor then 45 seconds to
connect(!) to the server. After having connected, speed is ok. Maybe these
two effects belong together?

Thank you for help,
joerg