[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ

Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
From: "Tony Heinz" <theinz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jun 12 09:24:16 2000
Organization: NutmegWeb
I currently lease my RAQ3 from Rackspace.com.  I have been using Rackspace
for about 5 months now.  I am very, very happy with their service.  I am
always able to get someone on the phone and I have never been on Hold for
more than 5 minutes.

They once screwed up on of my upgrades on another one of our servers
(non-cobalt).  When we called them on it they address the issue
immediately..

I have been on about 10 different host providers ofer the last 4 years, I
won't move to anyone else now that i use rackspace.

hope this helps you.

tony

----- Original Message -----
From: <cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2000 7:36 AM
Subject: cobalt-users digest, Vol 1 #932 - 23 msgs


>
> Send cobalt-users mailing list submissions to
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the web, visit
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cobalt-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of cobalt-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Kludgy solution for email catch all does not work
>  correctly ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   2. Re: RAQ3: Email alias with a "&" character ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   3. Re: Has anyone used Advanced Internet   Technologies(AIT)as
>  ISP? ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   4. Re: Pc Linux ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   5. Re: Best place to lease a RaQ (AllegroCEO)
>   6. Re: Best place to lease a RaQ (Emilio)
>   7. Re: Best place to lease a RaQ ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   8. Re: Best place to lease a RaQ ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   9. RE: Directory accounts (Jimmy Gross)
>   10. RE: Second Server - Host Name (Name Server) ([RaQ2] Chuck)
>   11. Re: Re: Mail Loops Back to Me Error (Dale McIsaac)
>   12. Re[2]: [cobalt-users] newbie needs help (Florian Effenberger)
>   13. RE: Second Server - Host Name (Name Server) (IntegraForm)
>   14. Which directories to backup? (Mike Fritsch)
>   15. Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] newbie needs help (Daniel Pfeifer)
>   16. Re: Second Server - Host Name (Name Server) (Daniel Pfeifer)
>   17. Re: automatic secondary DNS caching (Michael Zimmermann)
>   18. Re: PortSentry and Logcheck ? (Jeff Lasman)
>   19. Re: DNS-Entry via CGI-Script... again. (Jeff Lasman)
>   20. secure server probs (Simon Weller)
>   21. RE: (no subject) (Rodolfo Paiz)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:58:54 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Kludgy solution for email catch all does not
work
> correctly
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Chip wrote:
>
> > I came up with something that's an incredible kludge, but works
> > nonetheless.  We configure all mail (all domains) that doesn't match an
> > alias to go to one POP box.  This box is checked every two minutes by a
> > Eudora client running on one of our PCs, accessing the web server
through
> > our ISDN connection.  Eudora has one filter set up for each domain name,
so
> > anything that comes to anything "@domain1.com" is automatically
forwarded
> > to whomever is the designated recipient for that customer. Another
filter
> > for "@domain2.com" and for each domain. It's set up at the same time we
> > sign up the customer, so it's not difficult to administer.
>
> That is a very creative solution. I think you could further it with using
> fetchmail, a pop client for Unix that can also help automate a great deal
> of pop account handling.
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 19:28:11 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] RAQ3: Email alias with a "&" character
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Jeff Lasman wrote:
>
> > David Thacker wrote:
> >
> > > I've tried to add an email alias that includes a "&" character, but
the RaQ3
> > > GUI complains and does not add it.
> > >
> > > Can I safely edit the /etc/virtusertable to manually add this alias,
or will
> > > this hose my email system?  Has anyone done this successfully?
> >
> > I'm NOT looking at RFCs now, so I have no idea if the "&" sign is legal
> > in an address or not.
>
> Yes it is legal. No the Raq does not support it. If you go back to the
> archives, I think someone already addressed that in march, and there is a
> fix for the Cobalt scripts to allow them to accept the "&".
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 19:32:47 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Has anyone used Advanced Internet
Technologies(AIT)as
> ISP?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Jeff Lasman wrote:
>
> > About the only thing you can't say is that you invented the Internet
> > <smile>.  Unless you did, of course <smile, again>.
>
> Com'on Jeff stop the suspense, tell us you did it. <smile>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 20:36:08 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Cobalt <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Pc Linux
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Jonathan Alstead wrote:
>
> > Is the raq2 and the PC going to give results that will mirror each
other?
>
> Not enough. While most of the things that compile on Intel RH will compile
> on MIPS Cobalt RH, there are differences, especially when it comes to
> commercial software. Typically bug fixes and new releases are slow to come
> out on the mips platform, if they come at all...
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> From: "AllegroCEO" <john.burgess@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:17:01 -0500
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> So when did they move from San Antonio Texas to Arizona?
>
> --John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Emilio" <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 9:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
>
>
> > Try www.rackspace.com, they are located in Arizona and they have a very
> > impressive infrastructure. Service is fast and reliable. They handle
> > Cobalt's RaQ 2 and 3i servers, as well as other platforms.
> >
> > You can auto-quote the specific service you require based on you needs
> > from RAM to DB add-ons.
> >
> >
> > By the way, I dont work for them, but I know the company I work for is
> > teaming up for a raq's redundancy server from US to Mexico for hosting
> > purposses. Give them a try at they're site at a first instance.
> >
> >
> > Emilio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Marcus Barber wrote:
> >
> > > Hello ,
> > >
> > > I am interested in leasing a RaQ server, thus far I have
> > > narrowed my search to dialtoneinternet.com or
> > > hispeedhosting.com?  Anyone on the list using either of these
> > > companies?  Are you satisfied with the service?
> > >
> > > Marcus
> > > http://www.creditbargains.com
> > >
> > > ________________________________________________
> > > Get your own "800" number - Free
> > > Free voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
> > > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> >
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:26:13 -0600
> From: Emilio <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> There you go. Thanks for the anotation. Yes, they are in San Antonio, not
in
> Arizona as I stated before. Sorry and thanks for the correction.
>
>
>
> q:)
>
> Emilio
>
> p.s. good thing I was not the tipical jerk that said "I have been there"
;)
>
>
> AllegroCEO wrote:
>
> > So when did they move from San Antonio Texas to Arizona?
> >
> > --John
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Emilio" <emilio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 9:13 PM
> > Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
> >
> > > Try www.rackspace.com, they are located in Arizona and they have a
very
> > > impressive infrastructure. Service is fast and reliable. They handle
> > > Cobalt's RaQ 2 and 3i servers, as well as other platforms.
> > >
> > > You can auto-quote the specific service you require based on you needs
> > > from RAM to DB add-ons.
> > >
> > >
> > > By the way, I dont work for them, but I know the company I work for is
> > > teaming up for a raq's redundancy server from US to Mexico for hosting
> > > purposses. Give them a try at they're site at a first instance.
> > >
> > >
> > > Emilio
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Marcus Barber wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello ,
> > > >
> > > > I am interested in leasing a RaQ server, thus far I have
> > > > narrowed my search to dialtoneinternet.com or
> > > > hispeedhosting.com?  Anyone on the list using either of these
> > > > companies?  Are you satisfied with the service?
> > > >
> > > > Marcus
> > > > http://www.creditbargains.com
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________________________
> > > > Get your own "800" number - Free
> > > > Free voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
> > > > http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cobalt-users mailing list
> > > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:07:08 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>   This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
>   while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware
tools.
>   Send mail to mime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for more info.
>
> --1133135902-1293493117-960700028=:6636
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Emilio wrote:
>
> > Try www.rackspace.com, they are located in Arizona and they have a very
> > impressive infrastructure. Service is fast and reliable. They handle
> > Cobalt's RaQ 2 and 3i servers, as well as other platforms.
>
> I compiled a short list with a few prices and examples. Note that they are
> all cheaper than rackspace.com. However, I don't know about the level of
> service. Here it is attached as colocation.txt. Enjoy.
>
>
> --1133135902-1293493117-960700028=:6636
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="colocation.txt"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64
> Content-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006102307080.6636@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Description:
> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="colocation.txt"
>
> UHJpY2UgY29tcGFyaXNvbiBvZiBSYXEyIGhvc3Rpbmc6DQoNCkNvbXBhbnkg
> ICAgICAgICBTZXR1cCAgIENvbW1pdG1lbnQgICAgICBSYW0gICAgIEhEICAg
> ICAgUHJpY2UgICBCVyAgICAgIFByaWNlICAgSVBzICAgICBQcmljZSAgICAg
> ICAgICAgVVJMDQpTdXBlcmIgUmFRICAgICAgJDMwMCAgICAwICAgICAgICAg
> ICAgICAgNjRNYiAgICA4LjRHYiAgICQxMjUgICAgMjVHYiAgICAkMTQ1ICAg
> IDEyNSAgICAgJDUwIG9uZSB0aW1lICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cuc3VwZXJicmFx
> Lm5ldC9zZXJ2aWNlcy8jcmFxDQpBdEpldSAgICAgICAgICAgJDAgICAgICA2
> IG1vbnRoICAgICAgICAgNjRNYiAgICA4LjRHYiAgICQyNzUgICAgPyAgICAg
> ICAkMCAgICAgID8gICAgICAgPyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cu
> YXRqZXUuY29tL2RlZGljYXRlZC5odG1sDQpUaGVwbGFuZXQgICAgICAgJDAg
> ICAgICAwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgMzJNYiAgICAzLjJHYiAgICQ3NSAgICAg
> NDBHYiAgICAkMTUwICAgIDEgICAgICAgJDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHBz
> Oi8vd3d3LnRoZXBsYW5ldC5jb20vc2lnbnVwL3NpZ251cC5jZ2k/cHJvZHVj
> dD1jb2JhbHQNCndlYnBnICAgICAgICAgICAkMTUwICAgIDAgICAgICAgICAg
> ICAgICAzMk1iICAgIDQuM0diICAgJDYwICAgICA0MEdiICAgICQxNTAgICAg
> MTYgICAgICAkMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy53ZWJwZy5uZXQv
> aG9zdGluZy9jb2JhbHQuaHRtDQphd3dtICAgICAgICAgICAgJDAgICAgICAw
> ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgMzJNYiAgICA0LjNHYiAgICQyMDIgICAgNDBHYiAg
> ICAkOTcuNTAgIDE2ICAgICAgJDMwICAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93d3cu
> YXd3bS5jb20vcmFxMi8NCkNvbG9jYXRlVVNBICAgICAkMjAwICAgICAgICAg
> ICAgICAgICAgICA2NE1iICAgIDguNEdiICAgJDEyNSAgICA0MEdiICAgICQx
> OTkgICAgMjAgICAgICAkMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb2xv
> Y2F0ZXVzYS5jb20vc2VydmljZXMvDQpnZXR5b3VyLmNvbSAgICAgJDAgICAg
> ICAwICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgMzJNYiAgICA3LjZHYiAgICQzMDAgICAgNTBH
> YiAgICAkMCAgICAgIDQwICAgICAgJDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIGh0dHA6Ly93
> d3cuZ2V0eW91ci5jb20vcmFxLmh0bQ0KTWVkaWEzICAgICAgICAgICQyNzUg
> ICAgMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDY0TWIgICAgOC40R2IgICAkMzc1ICAgIDIw
> R2IgICAgJDAgICAgICAyMCAgICAgICQwICAgICAgICAgICAgICBodHRwOi8v
> d3d3Lk1lZGlhMy5uZXQvc2VydmljZXMvY29iYWx0L2NvYmFsdHByaWNlcy5o
> dG0NCkNvbW11bml0ZWNoICAgICAkMCAgICAgIDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAz
> Mk1iICAgIDQuM0diICAgJDMxOSAgICA0MEdiICAgICQwICAgICAgMTYgICAg
> ICAkMCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY29tbXVuaXRlY2gubmV0
> L2hvc3RpbmcvZGVkaWNhdGVkL3F1b3RlL2NvYmFsdDIuY2dpI3Byb2NlZWQN
> CkRpYWx0b25laW50ZXJuZXQkMCAgICAgIDAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAzMk1i
> ICAgIDQuM0diICAgJDIwMCAgICA1MEdiICAgICQwICAgICAgMTYgICAgICAk
> MCAgICAgICAgICAgICAgaHR0cDovL2RpYWx0b25laW50ZXJuZXQuY29tL2Nv
> YmFsdC9jb2JhbHRwcmljZXMuaHRtDQoNCg==
> --1133135902-1293493117-960700028=:6636--
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:09:14 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Marcus Barber wrote:
>
> > I am interested in leasing a RaQ server, thus far I have
> > narrowed my search to dialtoneinternet.com or
> > hispeedhosting.com?  Anyone on the list using either of these
> > companies?  Are you satisfied with the service?
>
> IMHO you should keep looking...
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 9
> Reply-To: <jimmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: "Jimmy Gross" <jimmy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Directory accounts
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:21:44 -0700
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When you create a user they get web space.
>
> http://www.mydomain.com/~user
>
> The Raq places a temp web page up.
>
> Jimmy Gross
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Marcus Barber
> Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2000 6:09 PM
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Directory accounts
>
>
> On a Raq 3 can I provide users with  directory based hosting
> such as http://www.mydomain.com/user
>
> If so with that type of account can users be given the usual raq
>  control panel?
>
> Marcus
> http://wwww.creditbargains.com
>
> ________________________________________________
> Get your own "800" number - Free
> Free voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
> http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:15:30 -0600 (MDT)
> From: "[RaQ2] Chuck" <nagy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Second Server - Host Name (Name Server)
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > If I register a domain at one of the reduced cost registrars... will
Network
> > Solutions still register a host (name server) for that domain - even
though
> > it is registered from else where?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > Registrars:
> > Internic would be the main DataBase of all the registrations.
> > Network Solutions and the other redistrars send their registrations to
> > Internic
> > So yes even if you register to a "reduce cost" registrar you are still
> > listed at Internic.
>
> Nope. There are other guys out there. In fact you can become your own
> ICANN certified registrar (last I heard it costs about $15,000) and then
> you can register for "free". Tucows is one of the best known alternative
> registrars, but they expect a minimum "registration trafic". I.e. you need
> to start by paying for 10 or 20 domains depending on the way you are set
> up with them. (http://www.opensrs.org)
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 11
> From: "Dale McIsaac" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Re: Mail Loops Back to Me Error
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 18:26:21 +1200
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks for your e-mail. I have checked my DNS configuration and just can't
> work out where I have gone wrong. Would you or anyone else be willing to
> look at my DNS records for me? I'm completely baffled.
>
> Thanks and regards
>
> Dale McIsaac
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick Voth" <nvoth@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, 11 June 2000 08:17
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Re: Mail Loops Back to Me Error
>
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is usually caused by a mail loop being set up in the MX records for
> the
> > domain name.  You will need to trace the mail routing sequence that you
> have
> > set up in all MX records. It can also be an issue that one or more DNS
> > servers don't have a current copy of your domain records and they point
to
> > the wrong place.
> >
> > Basically mail server A sends mail to mail server B which has old or
> > incorrect MX records and things that server A should deliver the mail,
> thus
> > you have your loop.
> >
> > -Nick Voth
> >
> >
> > > Message: 14
> > > From: "Dale McIsaac" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2000 23:40:32 +1200
> > > charset="iso-8859-1"
> > > Subject: [cobalt-users] Mail Loops Back to Me Error
> > > Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have a mail loops back to me error on some of the domains I am
> hosting.
> > > The mailserver reports: config error: mail lopps back to me (MX
> problem?)
> > > Local configuration error.
> > >
> > > The domain in question is filmsite.co.nz (209.217.19.172)
> > >
> > > Can anyone shed some light on this? Is it a DNS issue?
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-users mailing list
> > cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:08:11 +0200
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <39425680.D0E77332@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PM-CC.20000610182900.88B29.1.1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <39427A2A.9DA29202@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PM-CC.20000610195937.89AA6.1.1D@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <3942C049.9ADC2AA2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Florian Effenberger <florian.effenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] newbie needs help
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Hello,
>
> > i bought one; maybe i`ll buy another; we`ll see...
> Ah, which one did you buy? I am still deciding... ;-)
>
> > i intended operamail for usenet/mailinglists :-)
> Me, too.
>
> Florian
>
> --
> Florian Effenberger
> Dieser Account ist *NUR* für Mailinglisten gedacht!
> This account is *ONLY* for mailing lists!
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 13
> From: "IntegraForm" <markm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] Second Server - Host Name (Name Server)
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 03:16:07 -0400
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobalt-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]De la part de [RaQ2] Chuck
> Envoyé : 11 juin, 2000 01:16
> À : cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : RE: [cobalt-users] Second Server - Host Name (Name Server)
>
>
> > If I register a domain at one of the reduced cost registrars... will
> Network
> > Solutions still register a host (name server) for that domain - even
> though
> > it is registered from else where?
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> > Dan,
> >
> > Registrars:
> > Internic would be the main DataBase of all the registrations.
> > Network Solutions and the other redistrars send their registrations to
> > Internic
> > So yes even if you register to a "reduce cost" registrar you are still
> > listed at Internic.
>
> Nope. There are other guys out there. In fact you can become your own
> ICANN certified registrar (last I heard it costs about $15,000) and then
> you can register for "free". Tucows is one of the best known alternative
> registrars, but they expect a minimum "registration trafic". I.e. you need
> to start by paying for 10 or 20 domains depending on the way you are set
> up with them. (http://www.opensrs.org)
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> Chuck,
>
> I was under the impression that Internic(the Registry) still was
responsible
> for the maintaining of the "A" root server and that all Registrars updated
> Internic's registries?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 14
> From: "Mike Fritsch" <mfritsch@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 00:17:24 -0700
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Subject: [cobalt-users] Which directories to backup?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> I have been looking at as many emails regarding backing up my RaQ3. I have
> compiled a list of the directories that I should backup:
>
> /home
> /etc
> /var
> /usr/admserv
> /usr/local
>
> Does anybody suggest any other directories?
>
> Thanks
>   Mike
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 15
> Reply-To: "Daniel Pfeifer" <dpfeifer@xxxxxxx>
> From: "Daniel Pfeifer" <dpfeifer@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Cobalt Mailinglist" <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [cobalt-users] newbie needs help
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:56:29 +0200
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi Kollege (bin auch Deutscher),
>
> to your question about RaQ2 or RaQ3 I can just say: It might be easier to
install some software if it is Intel-plattform. Speed: Well, I think a
RISC-processor (RaQ2) might be faster. But if you ask me: So far I had no
probs with my RaQ2.
>
> To your operamailcomment: well, I use GMX ;)
>
> For German conversation we could open a majordomo list on one of our
servers ;)
>
> Daniel
>
> > > i bought one; maybe i`ll buy another; we`ll see...
> > Ah, which one did you buy? I am still deciding... ;-)
> >
> > > i intended operamail for usenet/mailinglists :-)
> > Me, too.
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 16
> Reply-To: "Daniel Pfeifer" <dpfeifer@xxxxxxx>
> From: "Daniel Pfeifer" <dpfeifer@xxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] Second Server - Host Name (Name Server)
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 09:57:43 +0200
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> We could put our money together and open our own registrant ;-)
>
> > Nope. There are other guys out there. In fact you can become your own
> > ICANN certified registrar (last I heard it costs about $15,000) and then
> > you can register for "free". Tucows is one of the best known alternative
> > registrars, but they expect a minimum "registration trafic". I.e. you
need
> > to start by paying for 10 or 20 domains depending on the way you are set
> > up with them. (http://www.opensrs.org)
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 17
> From: "Michael Zimmermann" <zim@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] automatic secondary DNS caching
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 10:16:23 +0200
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Anyone have an idea on how to make a Raq3 do secondary DNS carching from
a
> > primary DNS server on a Raq3i?
>
> Well, to clarify the usage of words first: acting a) as a secondary and b)
> doing caching
> are two different things for me.
>
> > I looked at /etc/named.conf on the raq3 and there is no line like:
> > zone "." {
> >   type hint;
> >   file "named.root";
> > };
>
> Well then put it in, if it's not there (on my RaQ3 it was called DB.cache
> by the way). BUT the hint-file is ONLY for the root-servers; that has
> NOTHING to do with acting as a secondary.
>
> So the first thing I would do is getting root and setting up named
> so that name-resolution is working on my RaQ.
>
> Where to get the root-cache:
> -----------------------------
>
> ;       This file is made available by InterNIC registration services
> ;       under anonymous FTP as
> ;           file                /domain/named.root
> ;           on server           FTP.RS.INTERNIC.NET
> ;       -OR- under Gopher at    RS.INTERNIC.NET
> ;           under menu          InterNIC Registration Services (NSI)
> ;              submenu          InterNIC Registration Archives
> ;           file                named.root
>
>
>
>
> Second thing - setting up named to act as a secondary:
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Well, you have to be listed as one of the secondary servers,
> and the primary has to know you and respond to your
> axfr requests in a supportive manner (so to say :o).
> No well set-up server will do that - execpt if the requests
> come from somebody he knows to be his secondaries.
>
> I don't think, that you are the secondary for intop.net.
> And being the secondary for 254.156.206.in-addr.arpa
> would mean that you had a whole bucket of IP-addresses
> delegated, which you have to register with RIPE or NIC
> or however you do that in your area.
>
> So your problem seems to boil down to the first case only.
> Right?
>
>
> Greetings
> Michael
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:22:54 -0700
> From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: nobaloney.net
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] PortSentry and Logcheck ?
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Mike Vanecek wrote:
>
> > Really nice post, thank you very much. Would you please consider putting
it in
> > a KB format and forwarding it to Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> for
> > inclusion in the KB?
>
> I'm certainly not the only one here who can post to the KB, and I don't
> post anything until I've tried it (but I do intend to try this <smile>).
>
> My guess is that Brent has posting permission as well.  If not, I'm sure
> he could get it by asking.
>
> Jeff
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672
> Riverside, CA  92517
> voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 01:42:18 -0700
> From: Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Organization: nobaloney.net
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] DNS-Entry via CGI-Script... again.
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> While that will restart the webserver, it will NOT convert the records
> in "/etc/named/records to actual pri (and sec) files.
>
> Sorry, but I don't know how to do it automatically.
>
> Jeff
>
> Thescripter@xxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Hi! You can automate this step by doing:
> > system("/etc/rc.d/init.d/named restart");
> --
> Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> nobaloney.net
> P. O. Box 52672
> Riverside, CA  92517
> voice: (909) 787-8589  *  fax: (909) 782-0205
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 20
> From: "Simon Weller" <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:25:16 +11
> Reply-to: simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cobalt-users] secure server probs
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Hi all,
>
> Just finished compiling and install modssl and opensll into apache.
>
> I'm trying to get a single secure server going with symbolic links from
the
> secure to other sites on the server.
>
> Based the idea on
http://ftp.cobaltnet.com/lists/cobalt-users/msg05433.html
>
> In his document he mentions setting  up the secure server address in
> "okaydomains"
>
> @okaydomains=("http://www.domain-name.com";, "https://www.secure-
> domain.com");
>
> I have no idea where this is...maybe I'm just being rather stupid.
>
> Anyone care to share their wisdom :-)
>
> regards,
>
> Simon
>
> ----
> Simon Weller
> NZ Servers
> Professional Hosting Services into the new millennium
> Specialising in Web and Database Development
> http://www.nzservers.com
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 21
> From: Rodolfo Paiz <rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [cobalt-users] (no subject)
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 05:37:16 -0500
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Reply-To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > The Qube2 has an email account support@xxxxxxxxxxx The email must be
> > forwarded to three other support staff.
> >
> > In the account settings you can set a forwarding address. What should
> > I do for multiple email address?
>
> No guarantees that this will work, but try simply separating the email
> addresses by commas, spaces, or semicolons. Then let us know if it
worked...
>
> Alternately, more complicated but fairly sure to work: Set up a mailing
list
> that only the Qube can post to, and have those three addresses subscribe
to
> it.
>
> ------
> Rodolfo J. Paiz
> rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --__--__--
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>
> End of cobalt-users Digest
>
Prev by Date: Re: [cobalt-users] Cobalt Security Notice - Linux Kernel - 06/09/00
Next by Date: [cobalt-users] Multiple IP's
Previous by thread: Re: [cobalt-users] Best place to lease a RaQ
Next by thread: [cobalt-users] Directory accounts
Sun Cobalt Users Message Index

Sun Cobalt Users Thread Index