Re: [cobalt-users] Re: find: /proc/5/fd: Permission denied (part 2)

["R. Hamburg .: HaVa Web- & Processdesign :." <user@xxxxxxx>]

> Found this after a little more Googling. The link is old, but seems to
still
> be a relevant/plausible explanation:
>
> - - - - - -
>
> http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9609.3/0296.html
>
> Now I don't know if that's A Good Thing or not; someone with a lot more
> experience with RAID etc would have to comment and/or look at the code and
> see if it could be changed.

Im not a real kernel expert. Anyone ? Brian ? Duncan ?

> FYI, I'm using a non-RAID RaQ 4 (not even a 4i); in theory, the non-RAID
> machines [sh|c]ould have a non-RAID enabled kernel, and then the
mdrecoveryd
> process wouldn't be an issue except on the 4r. But it *would* still be an
> issue on the 4r, so I guess it wouldn't hurt to check it out more...
>

I can confirm that the problems are available on raq4, 4i and a 4r.
The problems do not arise on a raq550. Maybe someone has something about
that.
Bruce if you want a look at a raq550 *if you have none ofcourse* contact me.
Offlist.

Robbert