RE: [cobalt-users] Greetings, and a quick question..

[Gerald Waugh <gwaugh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Adam Richardson wrote:

>        If RaQ550-All-Security-0.0.1-16622.pkg is bad, why is it
>       still on the
>       download page? I read that everything on the download page
>       was fixed!
> From Tony at Sun Microsystems:
>
> "I've had the patch pulled for all affected products.
> Myself & the rest of the Support Monkeys(tm) are looking at the code
> diffs to see *why* this is broke.
>
> At this point I can tell you this:
> it's broken & we don't know why.
>
> yes, that's a crappy answer. I wish I had a better one"
> There are several threads about this on the RaQ Forums -- here's a good
> summary:
>
> RaQ4-All-Security-2.0.1-16622.pkg Problem

yes, but what does "pulled" mean, it is still on the Sun/Cobalt patches
page. OH, I see, it is a broken link on the 550 patches page... which is
not good, as I for one scan the page to see if I have all the patches in the correct order

But it is not a broken link for the RaQ4,

Gerald
--
http://frontstreetnetworks.com | http://raqware.com
  Front Street Networks LLC, 229 Front Street, Ste.#C
  New Haven, CT 06513-3203 | phone: +1-203-785-0699