[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cobalt-users] raq 4 os
- Subject: Re: [cobalt-users] raq 4 os
- From: "Zeffie" <cobaltlist@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon Feb 9 09:00:01 2004
- Organization: Electronic Consultants Inc.
- List-id: Mailing list for users to share thoughts on Sun Cobalt products. <cobalt-users.list.cobalt.com>
> > Why RaQ4 and not RaQ550, which works perfectly on the RaQ3?
> There are actually a lot of reasons not to do this to your cobalt...
Things
> like...
> ---->>Loss of official support for the kernel.
> Q. So is upgrading from a Raq3 to a Raq4 keep within these guidelines? I
> thought the 550 os was opensourced by sun now. Doesn't that allow for
> opensource support?
yes and no.. there are parts that were not opensourced and thus chunks of it
are worthless.
> ---->>The 550 version is very hackable (it only takes about 30 seconds)
> Q. Hackable?? In a bad way? In a script kiddies kind of way, or in a XBOX
> kinda of way? Hacking the XBOX was the best thing that happened to that
> console. So many more options. It was a positive step. Unless your
> (Microsoft)
hackable in a "script kiddies kind of way"
get an account, wget, gcc bla, ./aout, done
> ---->>You take a risk when you flash those bios of turning it into a boat
> anchor
> (a bad one at that) or buying it all over again by having the chip
replaced
> by gerald... looking at
> http://store.raqware.com/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=82
> <http://store.raqware.com/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=82> it's
> $100
> more if you trash the rom... I would say this is a very nice offering by
> gerald and I might be tempted myself someday...
>
> Q. Know of a good guide you can recomend to avoind this pitfall.
not really.. I would reccomed geralds service first... after that I would
suggest you do a fresh restore of raq4 with no sites... and then do the
flash... it should work better on a fresh/smooth running box
> ----->>The thing that bothers me the most is the load issues... A RaQ3 is
a
> pretty
> slow server actually (only 596.37 bogomips) and as much as we have
problems
> with simple logrotation, and running the java stuff, to simple mail
> overloads... I just don't think it's a good choice to overload a machine
> with all this... and yes I know it can be done and will work to some
> degree...
>
>
> Q. I heard of a "mod" or upgrade to an AMD 400mhz?? What about maxing out
> the memory?? Can you go higher?
I have never done the processor upgrade and I have seen a raq3 > raq550
upgrade that wouldn't take a kernel update to save it's life... You can get
the processor upgrade on e-bay i noticed last night for about $50... I
don't know how well it works...
> ------>>I run a "Phoenix firewall" that has been converted to 550 and it
> does work
> fine... however it is for devel only and thus gets no traffic... This
> server is just so I can build things for the 550 line and nothing more..
>
> Q. I'm interested in hosting a small amount of sites for friend. Nothing
> heavy. Maybe 10-20 domains MAX. Is that too many? I'm sure one or two
would
> run a mysql forum the likes of phpbb2. I thought you could host something
> like 100 sites with these units.
> Michael
that should all work.. but it's not how many sites but instead the "load
factor" Ie: you can't run a high traffic site like playboy.com...
Zeffie
Cobalt RaQ System Administration, Maintenance and Repairs.
http://www.zeffie.com/how_to_contact_zeffie.html 734.454.9117
http://www.zeffie.com/ Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of RaQ rpms
Advanced Cobalt Security, Firewall, Snort, AntiSpam, AntiVirus, etc. GUI's
--
I'm Bart Simpson! Who the hell are you? -- Bart Simpson