Re: [cobalt-users] Qube Discussions

[thejrc <thejrc@xxxxxxxxx>]

from what I have seen
the RAQ is simply a rack mount version of the Qube
not sure though I beleive the RAQ is just a bit more popular whether due
to power or the rack mount configuration.  I just picked up a Qube2
myself and have had minimal problems with it   :::considering how new I
am to the unix environment:::  all of wich I have been able to sort out
rather easily.   in short, get what you need most of the operating
system based changes/problems/upgrades are for either system due to the
fact that it is not hardware related, beyond that  all I can tell you is
the Qube does what I need it to do and I like it.....

on a sidenote, if you have a number of RAQ's in a rack... its a rack of
servers
but a bookshelf full of Qubes....
would that be a Qubicle??

David Mitchell wrote:

> I am new to the list (2 days) and am considering a Qube2 for
> my company's new facility.  Judging from the minute number of
> posts to this list regarding the Qube, I can only assume that
> either the Qube is MUCH more stable than the RAQ, it is much
> less complex than the RAQ, there are MANY less units in use,
> the sheer volumn of RAQ posts scares Qube users away, some
> combination of the above, or there is some other reason that
> I am unaware of.
>
> Please feel free to enlighten me.
>
> David Mitchell
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To Subscribe or Unsubscribe, please go to:
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users