RE: [cobalt-users] Email query

[Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 07:58 PM 3/3/00 +0000, you wrote:
> Thanks for nothing.
>
> I have looked through the archives, but I cannot find the answer. I always
> try to research the answers first,

This has been actively discussed starting February 15th, and a fix was 
posted by a cobalt employee on February 16th.  I don't have a RaQ3, so I 
didn't memorize the posts or mark them in any special way.

But I just found them again, in a matter of a few moments by searching my 
archives looking for "RaQ3" and "catchall" in the BODY of the messages.

Here's what I found:

The first post, stating the problem:

2/15/00 01:24 PM -0500 Debbie Doerrlamm  [cobalt-users] catch all address

The first post addressing a definitive fix:

2/16/00 10:41 AM -0800 Duncan Laurie     [cobalt-users] raq3 catch-all 
alias problems (& solution)

A followup post, explaining the errors in thinking in the first post, and 
enumerating what Cobalt plans on doing for the fix:

2/16/00 10:13 PM -0800 Duncan Laurie     RE: [cobalt-users] raq3 catch-all 
alias problems (& solution)

Browsing the archives of posts for the last month would have found the same 
posts, I'm sure.

> but then I thought the idea of this list
> was to assist, or have I got it wrong?

Don't be so quick to brand me as nonhelpful.  You'll make some enemies that 
way <wry grin>.

> You might know the answers, but many others do not. That is why we are on
> the list.

A bit of searching of the list is always a good idea first, especially 
since this topic was so recently covered.

Certainly anyone else could have replied with specific answers.

> If anyone can assist me I would be grateful.

I think I just did.  If you can't find the posts now, let me know, and I'll 
find them and forward them to you.

Jeff

--
Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>