RE: [cobalt-users] RAQ Questions

[Mark Spieth <mspieth@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The core difference is that the Raq3 is intel based. This makes it much
easier to find software for. Also due to how Apache uses logging on the raq2
a raq3 is really a much better choice as the current limit on the raq2's
without modification is I believe 60 sites. The raq3 holds (at least mine
do) 200 average sites with out much problem, assuming you have lots of ram.

-----Original Message-----
From: Web Doctor [mailto:nywebdocter@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 4:21 PM
To: cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cobalt-users] RAQ Questions


Hi all,

We are looking into getting into the hosting business and have not as yet 
decided on a domain or what kind of servers we want to run. We came accross 
the Cobalt site and decided to join this list to see what this is all about.

I was trying to decide between a Raq 2 and Raq 3 and was wondering
which was better for web hosting say 160 customer sites?

The Raq 2 is a lot cheaper but it is as good or as fast as Raq 3?

What about email and web page server performance?

Are there any other important improvements in Raq 3 to be worth the higher 
price?

Is there a good place to find all the third party software available for 
both?

Your input is greatly appreciated.

George Gates
New York City

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com


_______________________________________________
cobalt-users mailing list
cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users