Re: [cobalt-users] FTP directories Re Cobalt Please take Note

["Jeffrey Ferguson" <yogi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I completely agree. I gotten a Cobalt RaQ2 from digitalNATION in just the
past weeks...

All this crap about changing things and voiding the warrenty...

I would suggest to anyone, to goto Amazon, and buy "Unix Unleashed" and grab
a dedicated Linux server instead of a Cobalt in the future!


----- Original Message -----
From: JJMA <jjma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 6:18 PM
Subject: [cobalt-users] FTP directories Re Cobalt Please take Note


>
> Well I agree with you Fathi on this one. I have had the RAQ for a couple
of
> months and come from a design background using win95/98. We were used to a
> straight forward(in a basic way) operating system where we could easily
> navigate and create on. We decided to go for the Raq as we were expecting
> having read the cobalt brochure that the raq system was a major initiative
> towards making server hosting user friendly for the non technical. The FTP
> directory 'log on' is a classic example of a major oversight on the
> corporations' behalf although must be something relatively easy to
> correct(if your listening cobalt), maybe in a patch or an update for
> existing RAQ owners.
>
> All of my clients, a 100%, have written or contacted me to say that they
> cannot upload their web sites because they don't know what ftp directory
to
> use and once told they groan! Could Cobalt of expected them to know where
> they should navigate, having no or little experience of FTP protocol, once
> logged in as a user to the PROPER/LIVE web directory?
>
> Not so user friendly after all, me thinks.
>
> Jonathan Alstead
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users
>
>