Re: [cobalt-users] RaQ2 to RaQ3

[Jeff Lasman <jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 11:13 PM 1/16/00  Kevin wrote:

> I am satisfied with my RaQ2.

I'm relatively satisfied with my RaQ2, but don't know that I'd buy 
another.  The only thing it has going for it for me is the 1u height.  I 
find the web-administration not as flexible as I'd like.  Yes, it speeds 
things up, but I can do the same with scripts and my own webpages.

However, if it does what you want it to do, then that's good.

> But the newer RaQ3 seems to have better
> features to it.

It already has a secure server, as I understand.  That's good, since people 
have had trouble installing them (I've installed them from scratch using 
patches, and I've used Red Hat's packaged secure server).

> Has anyone used both?

I'm sure, but not me <smile>.

> And is the RaQ3 the better investment?

Definitely.  The hardware is mainstream.  It's based on x86 architecture, 
meaning it's more mainstream, and some proprietary software is available 
for it that's just NOT available for the RaQ2 (i.e.: realserver).

Jeff






> Thanks
> Kevin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-users mailing list
> cobalt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-users

--
Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net
<jblists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<www.nobaloney.net>, <www.mailtraqna.com>, <www.email-lists.com>