Re: [cobalt-security] installs

[Theodore Jones <theoj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If one installs SSL Update Release 1.0 going from 48bit to 128-bit encryption,
but our SSL certificate is only 48-bit, will our system still be backward
compatible with the lower encryption of older browsers etc...?

~ Theo

PS:  anyone have any prudent advice about this new "love" virus... seems to be
an outlook only weekness...?

Tony wrote:

> You're missing a few.
>
> Cobalt OS Release 5.0
> RaQ3-All-Security-Point Release 2.4
> RaQ3-SecurityRelease 1.1
> RaQ3-Security Release 1.2
> RaQ3-SecurityRelease 1.4
> RaQ3-SecurityRelease 1.5
> RaQ3-SecurityRelease 2.2
> RaQ3-Update-SSL Release 1.0
> RaQ3E-Update-OS Release 2.0
> POP-Authenticated SMTP Relaying Release 1.2
>
> BTW, did you install PHP 4 from a pkg or was it preinstalled?
>
> Tony
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Theodore
> > Jones
> > Sent: Friday, April 28, 2000 2:06 PM
> > To: Cobalt Security Disc.
> > Subject: [cobalt-security] installs
> >
> >
> > At present I have the following items installed on my company's new
> > RaQ3:
> >
> > Cobalt OS Release 5.0
> > RaQ3-SecurityRelease 1.1
> > RaQ3-Update-OS Release 1.0
> > PHP Release 4.0p1
> >
> > For a relatively large organization + heavy outside trafic to the
> > server, does anyone think list meets the minimum extra security installs
> > that I should make or update?  Would anybody else strongly suggest
> > installing anything in addition?
> >
> > ~ Theo
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cobalt-security mailing list
> > cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-security mailing list
> cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security