I didn't know that. I don't know about adding a modem. No telling what might break in the GUI though. I went to my local Heffer store (gateway) and inquired about the rebadged cube. They didn't know what I was talking about. I asked if they ever checked out their own web site - and got a 'you talk'n to me' kind of look before I was informed that gateway did windows not linux. That's great considering their headquarters is only a two hour drive from me. I'd really like to experience the product. It sounds better then the original and Cobalt's MIA support is making me too nervous to keep recommending their products to my clients. What's up with that? Nine months ago I could get a tech support call back within 30 minutes. Now I can't even get a reply to an email. I'm about fed up with them and seeing all of the issues floating around on the list makes me more nervous. Seems like people are spending a lot of time trying to fix a lot of broken units out there without cobalt's help. Like many of us, I do this stuff for a living and bill only for my time, and get paid for my time only if my customers are resonably satisfied with their results. When I recommend a product, I need access to answeres quickly, not problems. I am not a, nor are my clients, beta site. Cobalt has really been giving me cause to rethink how I am doing things. What do you think? Jeff -----Original Message----- From: cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cobalt-security-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Malcolm McLeary Sent: Monday, March 20, 2000 5:54 PM To: cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] Qube2 Firewall "feature" Hi Jeff, > Maybe I'm late to this thread, but wouln't an external modem on the serial > port work and be alot simpler to configure. I don't want to sound foolish - > but am I missing something? The "original" Qube does not have a serial port ... it would require some sort of PCI card to connect an external modem ... IMHO why not just use a PCI modem. The Gateway Micro Server (i.e. rebadged Qube2) comes with a PCI modem so there is a working config. > BTW: With all of the low cost high speed unprotected connections out there > now, It could perhaps be reasonable to consider the full-time 56k somewhat > secure from the point of view that the connection's bandwidth would not > generate much hacker interest. I think that unless they found something > very interesting or had a direct reason to intrude, they would consider the > system as undesirable for use as an unwitting requestor in a distributed DOS > attack. True, but just because attack is unlikely is no reason to do nothing ... it just means you don't have to spend as much. Cheers, Malcolm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Information Alchemy Pty Ltd ACN 089 239 305 Canberra, Australia Malcolm McLeary Mobile: 0412 636 086 Managing Director Email: mim@xxxxxxxxxx This message was sent using Outlook Express 5.0 for Macintosh. _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list cobalt-security@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
Sun Cobalt and Linux Support by Zeffie.com
Zeffie's Sun Cobalt User Forums
A Sun Cobalt and Linux Support Specialist Since 1999
Sun Cobalt Support, Repairs, Development, and Maintenance.
Home of the Worlds Largest Collection of Sun Cobalt Updates!
Sun Cobalt Spam Filter, Security, Firewall, Anti Virus Products.
734-454-9117 US Toll Free 800-231-4459
Zeffie's Sun Cobalt Restore CD's Zeffie's Sun Cobalt Updates
Sun Cobalt Users List Sun Cobalt Security List Sun Cobalt Developers List
Zeffie's Sun Cobalt User Forums
Copyright 2009 by Electronic Consultants Inc.