Re: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location

["Ontario Web System Administrator" <hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ken,
I do not know much about raqport other then I have seen them on the net for
a few years.

I am just wonder why you do not just upgrade your Raq you have now to a 550?

There are also many good colocate facilities here right in Ontario. " Not
trying to take away from Raqport "

We have just opened a new data center with Digital Networks in
Smithfalls that is working out really well.

PS: for reference ....I am just located in Brockville Area

--
Best Regards, Jon

System Administrator & Lead Developer
< http://www.ontarioweb.ca > 1-866-209-0349
< hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >

===========================================
The contents hereof may be a privileged and
confidential communication. Unauthorized use
is prohibited. If you have received this message
in error, return e-mail immediately and delete
the original.

Thank you for your cooperation.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Studds McButt" <studds@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:18 AM
Subject: [cobalt-developers] Server Co-Location


> Has anyone had experience with raqport?
>
> We are considering moving from cobaltracks (Visual Link) where we have a
> raq4i, to raqport and upgrading to a raq550 at the same time.
>
> The purpose of the move is to get better service, mainly telephone
> requests for reboots, software installations and automatic security
> upgrades.
>
> We plan to buy the 550 from raqport and co-locate it there. But I can't
> find any background information on the company.
>
> Any information -- good or bad -- would be helpful.
>
> Thanks
>
> Ken Waldie
> The Media Works
> Kingston, Canada
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-developers mailing list
> cobalt-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Ontario Webs MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>